An Analysis on Cognitive Domain in the Topic of Money for Year 5 and Year 6 Mathematics Textbooks Revised KSSR 2017
Analisis Domain Kognitif Bagi Topik Wang Dalam Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 5 dan Tahun 6 KSSR Semakan 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol12.2.1.2022Keywords:
Mathematics Textbooks, cognitive domain, money, TIMSS framework, revised KSSRAbstract
Curriculum transformation has led to the production of the mathematics textbook revised KSSR 2017. Financial Education elements is applied directly through the topic of Money. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the cognitive domain for contents and exercises found in the topic of Money in Year 5 and Year 6 Mathematics textbooks included Sekolah Kebangsaan (SK) and Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina (SJKC) syllabus, as well as to determine the level of cognitive domain based on Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) framework. Document analysis through coding technique was used to categorize all the contents and exercises in the topic of Money according to types of exercises, cognitive domains and aspects of cognitive domain. The results of the study showed that SK and SJKC Year 5 Mathematics textbooks are dominant in the knowing domain with its focus on compute aspect, which reached a low level of cognitive domain. Meanwhile, the SK and SJKC Year 6 Mathematics textbooks are dominant in the reasoning domain, which reached a high level of cognitive domain. However, the SK Year 6 Mathematics textbook focused more on analyze aspect while the SJKC Year 6 Mathematics textbook focused more on integrate or synthesize aspect. Comparisons made on Year 5 and Year 6 Mathematics textbooks have found that there are significant differences in term of number and percentage of the contents and exercises in the topic of Money based on domain cognitive. Given such a scenario, the quality of textbooks should be reviewed from time to time to bridge the gap in the cognitive domain of textbooks across grades and school streams in order to ensure an equality cognitive development among Malaysian students.
Downloads
References
Abdul Azis, A., & Rosli, R. (2021). Analisis Aras Kognitif Bagi Soalan dalam Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 4 KSSR Semakan. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(3), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i3.712
Agrobank. (2016, Mei 14). Program Celik Wang Agrobank Didik Pelajar Mengenai Asas Pengurusan Wang. https://www.agrobank.com.my/my/press-releases/program-celik-wang-agrobank-didik-pelajar-mengenai-asas-pengurusan-wang/
Alpízar-Vargas, M., & Morales-López, Y. (2019). Teaching The Topic of Money in Mathematics Classes in Primary School. Acta Scientiae, 21(5), 102-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5262
Ann-Katrin, V. D. H., & Heinze, A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59(2018), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.005
Babakr, Z. H., Mohamedamin, P., & Kakamad, K. (2019). Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory: Critical Review. Educational Quarterly Reviews, 2(3), 517-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.84
Bicknell, B., & Hunter, R. (2012). School Transition From Year 6 To Year 7: A Focus On Mathematics. International Journal for mathematics teaching and learning.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Chan, Y. L., Krishnan, G., & Mohd Ali, R. (2020). Matematik Tahun 5 Sekolah Kebangsaan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Chan, Y. L., Krishnan, G., & Mohd Ali, R. (2021). Matematik Tahun 6 Sekolah Kebangsaan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Chang, F. Y., & Rosli, R. (2021). Analisis Kognitif Topik Data dalam buku teks Matematik SJKC Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Negara (SKEPEN 2021), 651-660.
Cheng, J. W., & Rosli, R. (2020). Analisis Domain Kognitif bagi Latihan dalam Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 6. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(11), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i11.549
Chuen, T. L., & Rosli, R. (2021). The Content Domain Analysis of the Revised KSSR Standard 4 Mathematics Textbook Version 2017. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(2), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.2.5.2021
Cordero, J. M., Gil-Izquierdo, M., & Pedraja-Chaparro, F. (2022). Financial education and student financial literacy: A cross-country analysis using PISA 2012 data. The Social Science Journal, 59(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.07.011
Ee, J. H., Huh, Y., Shin, M., & Huh, N. (2019). Cognitive Domain of Problems in Korea Mathematics Textbooks. The Youngnam Mathematical Society, 35(4), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.7858/eamj.2019.037
Ghazali, M., & Sinnakaudan, S. (2014). A Research on Teachers’ Beliefs about Mathematics Teaching and Learning between Sekolah Kebangsaan (SK) Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina (SJKC) and Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil (SJKT). Journal of Education and Practice, 5(31), 10-19.
Hadar, L. L., & Ruby, T. L. (2019). Cognitive opportunities in textbooks: the cases of grade four and eight textbooks in Israel. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(1), 54-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1564968
Julie, L. J. H., & Maat, S. M. (2021). The Utilisation of Textbook in Teaching and Learning Mathematics among Primary School Mathematics Teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 907–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/10174
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 5. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020). Laporan Kebangsaan TIMSS 2019. Putrajaya: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2021). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 6. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
Kheu, N. M. Y., & Nunes, T. 2017. Learning Numbers in Different Languages: Chinese versus Malay. Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.26711/007577152790011
Leow, Y. W., Wang, B. P., & Lee, K. N. (2020). Matematik Tahun 5 Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbitan Pelangi Sdn. Bhd.
Lim, T. S., Ahmad Baharul Ulum, Z. K., AG Budin, S., & Mohidin, R. (2020). Hubungkait Pengetahuan Kewangan dan Kesedaran Insurans Hayat dan Takaful Keluarga.
Lindorff, A. M., Hall, J., & Sammons, P. (2019). Investigating a Singapore-Based Mathematics Textbook and Teaching Approach in Classrooms in England. Frontier in Education, 4(37),1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00037
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2006). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
Mohd. Tajudin, N., & Chinnappan, M. (2017). Role of Higher Order Thinking Skills In Enhancing Mathematical Problem Solving. Man In India, 97(17), 209-214.
Mohd Yusof, Z. (2022 Februari 28). ‘Yang Dewasa Pun Tak Faham, Apatah Murid Tahun 6’, pensyarah UPM komen silibus insurans dan takaful. Free Malaysia Today. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/bahasa/tempatan/2022/02/28/yang-dewasa-pun- tak-faham-apatah-murid-tahun-6-pensyarah-upm-bidas-silibus-insurans-dan-takaful/
Muhammad Raflee, S. S., & Halim, L. (2021). The Effectiveness of Critical Thinking in Improving Skills in KBAT Problem Solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(1), 60- 76. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.1.6.2021
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2017). TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. Retrieved from Boston ollege, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/
Nik Pa, N. A. (2016). Penghasilan Disertasi Berkualiti dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya
Oates, T. (2014). Why textbooks count: A policy paper. University of Cambridge.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. New York: Basic Books.
Pratama, G. S., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Urgency of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Content Analysis in Mathematics Textbook. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1097.
Rasyidi, D. A., & Winarso, W. (2020). The Proportion of Cognitive Aspects of Question in Mathematics Textbook Based on Marzano's Taxonomy: An Indonesian Case in Implementing New Curriculum. EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 79-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i2.7374
Samat, A. A., & Rosli, R. (2020). Exploring Teacher’s Perceptions of Primary School Mathematics Textbook. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 286-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i1/7043
Tan, K. J., Ismail, Z., & Abidin, M. (2018). A Comparative Analysis on Cognitive Domain for the Malaysian Primary Four Textbook Series. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1273-1286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/82625
Voon, Y. X., & Kor, A. S. (2022). Matematik Tahun 6 Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina. Johor Bahru: Penerbit Bestari Sdn. Bhd.
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass media research. (Edisi ke-10). Cengage learning.
Zakaria, N. L., Sabri, M. F., & Abd. Rahim, H. (2017). Penilaian Impak Program Pendidikan Kewangan Dalam Kalangan Peserta Program Bijak Wang. Jurnal Pengguna Malaysia, 19-38.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ying Shian Tay, Roslinda Rosli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
