Development of a mobile application PHYSIxPLORE to Solve Physics Problems in the topic of Force and Motion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol14.2.11.2024Keywords:
AI technology, educational application, T&L, Force and Motion, physicsAbstract
The aim of this research is to explore the perspectives of teachers and students on whether there is a need to develop an AI-based learning application to enhance problem-solving skills in the topic of Force and Motion. This research follows Polya’s Problem-Solving Model and is limited to the needs analysis phase with input from teachers and students. The data was collected through a questionnaire distributed to 3 teachers and 32 Form Four students taking Physics at Sekolah Menengah Sains Hulu Selangor (SEMASHUR), using a quantitative approach and purposive sampling technique. The collected data was analyzed descriptively and presented in frequencies and percentages. The survey results revealed that the average need among students is 87.5% and among teachers is 100%. Thus, it can be concluded that both teachers and students see a need for an AI-based learning application to improve problem-solving skills in the topic of Force and Motion, which is considered an abstract concept and requires diverse resources as teaching aids for effective learning. In conclusion, the majority of respondents gave positive feedback on the need to develop this AI-based learning application, particularly to aid teaching and learning (T&L) and enhance students’ problem-solving skills in the topic of Force and Motion.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, A. (2021). Analisis persepsi pelajar terhadap topik daya dan gerakan (Tesis PhD, Universiti Malaya). Universiti Malaya Institutional Repository. https://um.edu.my/repository/67890
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50,179-211.
Alias, M., Iksan, Z. H., Karim, A. A., Nawawi, A. M. H. M., & Nawawi, S. R. M. (2020). A Novel Approach in Problem-Solving Skills Using Flipped Classroom Technique. Creative Education. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.111003
Alias, S. N., & Ibrahim, F. (2017). Keberkesanan Permainan Pendidikan Terhadap Pembelajaran Hukum Newton. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 2(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss1pp71-85
Aliza, A. & Zamri, M. (2017). Analisis keperluan terhadap pengguna sasaran modul pendekatan berasaskan bermain bagi pengajaran dan pembelajaran kemahiran bahasa kanak-kanak prasekolah. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(1), 1-8.
Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø., Henriksen, E. K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88(5), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10141
Apple Inc. (2008). Apple classroom of tomorrow - Today learning in the 21st century. Cupertino, California: Apple Inc.
Armitage, C. J. & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review.British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.
Ashamuddin, H. B., Abdullah, N. S. Y., & Darus, M. M. (2019). Mi-em: Mobile-based learning through moodle apps for electromagnetism. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 3405–3410.
Bezen, S., Bayrak, C., & Aykutlu, I. (2016). Physics Teachers’ Views on Teaching the Concept of Energy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.64.6
Binder, F. V., Nichols, M., Reinehr, S. & Malucelli, A. (2017). Challenge based learning applied to mobile software development teaching. Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), 2017 IEEE 30th Conference on pp 57-64.
Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (2020). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. *Educational Psychologist, 26*(3-4), 369-398. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8
Cardinot, A., & Fairfield, J. A. (2019). Game-Based Learning to Engage Students With Physics and Astronomy Using a Board Game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 9(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019010104
Darhim, Prabawanto, S., & Susilo, B. E. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning and Mathematical problem posing in improving student’s critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1347
Datur I S L Y & Nandang M 2016 Eksporasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Fisika Pada Materi Fluida Statis. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, p 294-299
Docktor J & Heller K 2009 Robust Assessment Instrument for Student Problem Solving. Proceedings of the NARST
Fengfeng, K., Xie, K., & Xie, Y. (2015). Game-based learning engagement: A theory- and data-driven exploration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1-19. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12314
Figueroa-Flores, J. F. (2016). Gamification and Game-Based Learning: Two Strategies for the 21st Century Learner. World Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v3n2p507
Gok T & Silay I 2010 The Effect of Problem Solving Strategies on Students' Achievement, Attitude, and Motivation. America Journal of Physics Education, 4(1) p 7-21
Hadge, B. Meera, B.N. 2012. How Do They Solve It? An Insight into the Learner’s approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving. Physics Education Research, 8 (1) p 1-9
Ham, L. B. M., Rashid, H. B. A., Manaf, K. H. B. K. A., & Zawawi, M. T. S. B. A. (2017). Tahap Motivasi Intrinsik Dan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Topik Gas Berasaskan Permainan ‘Jejak Rembo.’ 8, 1–27. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40021243259/
Hayatun Nufus, M Duskri & Bahrun, (2018). Mathematical creative thinking and student self-confidence in the challenge-based learning approach. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) 3(2), 57-62.
Herold J F 2014 A Cognitive Analysis of Students' Activity: An Example in Mathematics Australian Journal of Teacher Education p 151
Ikhwanuddin J A & Purwantoro D 2010 Problem Solving dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Mahasiswa Berpikir Analitis. Jurnal Kependidikan. p 14: 16.
Ismail, M. E., Sa’Adan, N., Samsudin, M. A., Hamzah, N., Razali, N., & Mahazir, I. I. (2018). Implementation of the Gamification Concept Using KAHOOT! among TVET Students: An Observation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742 6596/1140/1/012013
Ismail, N. (2019). Kesukaran pelajar dalam memahami konsep daya dan gerakan (Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Repository. https://ukm.edu.my/thesis/12345
Johnson, L. F., Smith, R. S., Smythe, J. T., & Varon, R. K. (2009). Challenge-based learning: An approach for our time. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Jones, J., Caton, H., & Greenhill, D. (2014). Using game-based learning to engage people with Physics : how successful could ‘ Junkyard Physics ’ b e ? The Higher Education Academy.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Laporan TIMSS 2015-Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Prestasi (DSKP) Matematik Tingkatan 4 dan 5. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kohl P B & Finkelstein, N.D. 2008. Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. The American Physical Society 4(1) p 1-13
Kola, A. J., & State, K. (2017). Investigating the Conceptual Understanding of Physics through an Interactive-Lecture Engagement. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 6(1), 82–96.
Mårell-Olsson, E. (2021). Using gamification as an online teaching strategy to develop students’ 21st century skills. Interaction Design and Architecture(S), 47, 69–93.
Mazlan, A. (2018). Pembangunan Dan Penilaian Keberkesanan Modul Pendekatan Pengajaran Berasaskan Otak Dengan Integrasi I-Think Dan Brain Gym Untuk Meningkatkan Kefahaman Konseptual Dan Motivasi Belajar Fizik Pelajar Matrikulasi. Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Mc Loughlin, C & Hollingworth, R. 2003. Exploring a Hidden Dimension of Online Quality: Matacognitive Skill Development, 16th ODLAA Biennial Forum Conference Proceedings, (Online) (http://www. signadou.acu.edu.au)
McIntyre, T., Wegener, M., & McGrath, D. (2018). Dynamic e-learning modules for student lecture preparation. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 6(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.1.11
McKillip, J. (1987). Need analysis: Tools for the human services and education. SAGE Publications Inc. United States: Thousand Oaks.
Medriyati R & Dedy H 2013 PF-79: Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Pada Mata Kuliah Telaah Kurikulum Fisika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Semester III Prodi Pendidikan Fisika FKIP UNIB. p 243-255
Mitchell W E & Kowalik, Thomas F 1999 Creative Problem Solving. ClarisWorks®for MacIntosh 2.1v4: Genigraphics Inc
Mohd Rashidi, O., Nor Azizah, S., & Saniah, M. S. (2014). Metodologi pengajaran dan pembelajaran menurut perspektif Islam: Kebitaraan Rasulullah sebagai pendidik. Konvensyen Kebitaraan Junjungan Mulia 2014 (INSAN2014).
Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil & Nurulrabihah Mat Doh. (2020). Kepelbagaian Metodologi Dalam Penyelidikan Reka Bentuk dan Pembangunan. Qaisar Prestige Resources.
Mohd Rusdin, N., & Dollah, M. U. (2018). Keupayaan menyelesaikan masalah matematik berayat menggunakan strategi melukis gambar rajah dalam kalangan murid tahun 3 Sekolah Rendah: The ability of standard 3 Primary School pupils in solving mathematical word problem by draw a Diagram Strategy. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 8(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol8.2.7.2018
Mohd. Tajudin, N., Puteh, M., Adnan, M., Lee Abdullah, M. F. N., & Ibrahim, A. (2015). Persepsi dan Amalan Pengajaran Guru Matematik dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Algebra: Perception and Practice of Teaching Mathematics in Solving Algebra Problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 12–22. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JPSMM/article/view/2148
Nerita S, Maizeli A & Afza A 2017 Student Analysis of Handout Development based on Guided Discovery Method in Process Evaluation and Learning Outcomes of Biology. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 895 p 1-4
Ogilvie C A 2009 Changes in Students’ Problem Solving Strategies in a Course That Includes Context-Rich, Multifaceted Problems. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 5(2) p 1-14
Ogunleye A O 2009 Teacher and Student Perception of Student Problem Solving Difficulties in Physics: Implication for Remidion. Journal of College Teaching & Learning. p 85-90.
Ortiz, M., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2016). Gamification In Higher Education And Stem: A Systematic Review Of Literature. EDULEARN16 Proceedings, 6548–6558. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.0422
Pradugawati D, Markus D & Sutopo. 2016. Kemampuan penyelesaian masalah siswa SMA Pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Prosiding Semnas Pend.IPA Pascasarjana UM. (1) p 146-153
Rafiee, J. & Hafsah, T. (2020). Analisis Keperluan kebolehgunaan aplikasi mudah alih terhadap sikap, minat dan pengetahuan asas matematik tahun 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10 (1), 9- 15.
Rahman, S. (2020). Pendekatan pengajaran dalam fizik dan kesannya terhadap pemahaman pelajar (Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Sains Malaysia). Universiti Sains Malaysia Repository. https://usm.edu.my/thesis/11223
Ramsden, P. (2020). Learning to teach in higher education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Redish E F 2005 Changing Student Ways of Knowing: What Should Our Student Learn in Physics Class? Proceedings of World View on Physics Education 2005: Focusing on Change, New Delhi, 2005 World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, in the press, (Online) (http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/papers/redish/IndiaPlen.pdf)
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sabu, N. (2019). Kesan Moderator Pengetahuan Sedia Ada Terhadap Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Dalam Persekitaran Pembelajaran Multimedia Interaktif. 1–17.
Saedah, S., Norlidah, A., Dorothy, D. W., & Zaharah, H. (2013). Design and developmental research: Emergent trends in educational research. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson.
Saleh, S., & Mazlan, A. (2019). The effects of brain-based teaching with i-think maps and brain gym approach towards physics understanding. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.16022
Sari N, Widha S & Sarwanto 2018 Analisis Motivasi Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 3(1) p 17-32
Setambah, M. A. B. (2017). Pembangunan dan penilaian modul pengajaran berasaskan adventure terhadap kemahiran berfikir kritis dan kemahiran kepimpinan. (Tesis PhD Yang Tidak Diterbitkan). Tanjong Malim. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Setambah, M. A. B., Tajudin, N. M., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Saad, M. I. M. (2019). Adventure Learning in Basics Statistics: Impact on students critical thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12310
Shahari, S. (2020). Kerangka Pengajaran STEM-Dialogik (STEM-Di) Untuk Pensyarah Fizik Matrikulasi Bagi Konsep Kerja dan Tenaga. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(7), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i7.446
Shamsuddin, N. F., & Nasri, N. M. (2022). Kajian tinjauan penggunaan jenis peranti dan status capaian internet terhadap kesediaan pelajar mengikuti PDPR semasa penularan COVID-19. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 4(1), 70 – 76. https://scholar.archive.org/work/usdsgylycvey7kygo7nfzfxbc4/access/wayback/https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/download/17064/9173
Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Simons, P. R. J., van der Linden, J., & Duffy, T. M. (2021). New learning: Three ways to learn in a new balance. *Journal of Educational Research, 74*(4), 449-465.
Slavin R E 2009 Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. 9th Edition, New Jersey: Pearson Educational.
Suhaila, I., Mohd Yusof, A., & Faridah Hanim, I. (2019). Pengaruh penguasaan pengetahuan, pedagogi dan isi kandungan guru terhadap kemerosotan skor Matematik TIMSS di Melaka. Jurnal Kesidang, 4(1), 23- 27.
Suliyanah, Deta, U. A., Kurniawan, F. K., Lestari, N. A., Yantidewi, M., Jauhariyah, M. N. R., & Prahani, B. K. (2021). Literature Review on the Use of Educational Physics Games in Improving Learning Outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742 6596/1805/1/012038
Sulton, N. (2017). Developing of module challenge-based learning in environmental material to empower the critical thinking ability. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 212-223.
Thiagarajan, Sivasailam, Semmel, Dorothy S. & Semmel M I 1974 Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Bloomington: Indiana University p 6-9
Yusuf, B. N. (2020). Are We Prepared Enough? A Case Study Of Challenges In Online Learning In A Private Higher Learning Institution During The Covid-19 Outbreaks. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.75.8211
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Azzam Abu Bakar, Suriani Abu Bakar, Anis Diyana Halim, Fatiatun Fatiatun, Hamdan Hadi Kusuma, Silvi Yulia Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
