The Effectiveness of Web 2.0 Tools Training Workshop Using Canva and Figma in Developing Creative Visual Content


  • Norshahila Ibrahim Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Albert Yakobus Chandra Faculty of Information Technology, Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Erni Marlina Saari Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Putri Taqwa Prasetyaningrum Faculty of Information Technology, Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Irfan Pratama Faculty of Information Technology, Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Indonesia



Web Tools, Creative Visual Content, Online Training, Effectiveness


Due to its accessibility, convenience, and capacity to meet a variety of learner needs, web tools have become increasingly popular as a way to acquire these abilities. However, there is lack of study on the efficacy of web tools in fostering creativity and the role that web tools play in this process. It prompts to critically examine whether these virtual learning environments are genuinely successful in cultivating creative skills and, if they are, how web tools function as catalysts for their effectiveness. Thus, this paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of web 2.0 tools using Canva and Figma in enhancing creativity in the domain of visual content creation. The methodology was adapted and modified from the Kirkpatrick's evaluation model, focusing on four key levels: (1) Reaction, (2) Learning, (3) Behavior, and (4) Results. The participants for the training were undergraduate students from Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris dan Universitas Mercu Buana Y.ogyakarta The research design involves a multi-dimensional assessment that includes survey, and pre-test and post-test. The study findings indicate that graphic design web tools significantly contribute to the development of creativity in visual content. The lowest mean score value for the training is 4.26 and the highest mean score value is 4.48. The analysis highlights that the participants experienced notable improvements in their creative skills after completing the training, with an increase in the quality and diversity of their visual content. The adapted evaluation model provides a holistic understanding of the impact of digital learning on participants, including their reactions, the knowledge acquired, changes in creative behavior, and the tangible outcomes of their creative endeavors.


Download data is not yet available.


Ali Ridho, Kusaeri, Nasaruddin, & Fathur Rohman. (2020). Evaluasi program gerakan furudhul ainiyah (gefa) dengan menggunakan model kirpatrick. FIKROTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Managemen Islam, 11(2), 1480–1495.

Enikő Orsolya Bereczki, & Andrea Kárpáti. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39.

Farhana, F., Sajari, M., Pendidikan, F., Kebangsaan, U., Hafizhah, M., Pendidikan, Z. F., & Kebangsaan Malaysia, U. (2023). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instruman Kesediaan GPI Melaksanakan Model Tasmik j-QAF Secara Dalam Talian (Validity and Reliability of a GPI Readiness Instrument Implementing the j-QAF Tasmic Model). In JQSS-Journal of Quran Sunnah Education and Special Needs (Vol. 7).

Gu, X., Ritter, S. M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2023). Online Creativity Training: Examining the Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Training Approach. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

Gu, X., Tan, Y., Wu, X., Cai, Z., Lai, Q., Cheng, M., & Zhao, Q. (2022). Active versus Passive Strategy in Online Creativity Training: How to Best Promote Creativity of Students with Different Cognitive Styles? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101021.

Jack Shepherd. (2023, July 26). 19 Essential Canva Statistics You Need To Know in 2023. The Social Shepherd.

Jarmanto, Hilal Madjdi, & Gunawan Setiadi. (2022). The Effect of Individual Guidance Through Google Classroom Towards Learning Outcomes of Science Lessons. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 13–19.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2008). Evaluating Training Programs. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kirkpatrick J. D., & Kirkpatrick W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation. ATD Press.

Li, Y., Kim, M., & Palkar, J. (2022). Using emerging technologies to promote creativity in education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3.

Malar Hirudayaraj, & Jennifer Matić. (2021). Leveraging Human Resource Development Practice to Enhance Organizational Creativity: A Multilevel Conceptual Model. Human Resource Development Review (HRDR), 20(2).

Malcolm S. Knowles, Elwood F. Holton III, & Richard A. Swanson. (2015). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development (8th ed.). Routledge.

Matthew T. Ballew, Allen M. Omoto, & Patricia Winter. (2015). Using Web 2.0 and Social Media Technologies to Foster Proenvironmental Action. Sustainability, 7(8), 10620–10648.

Mavri, A., Ioannou, A., & Loizides, F. (2021). Cross-organisational Communities of Practice: enhancing creativity and epistemic cognition in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 100792.

Nawastheen, F. M., Palthamburaj, K., Shifaan, S., & Thannimalai, T. (2023). A study on the readiness and attitudes of Sri Lankan Tamil medium teachers towards the use of ICT in teaching and learning. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(6), 54–62.

Rahimi, S., & Shute, V. J. (2021). First inspire, then instruct to improve students’ creativity. Computers and Education, 174.

Simkova, I., Bondarenko, O., & Bielovetska, L. (2021). Web-based applications to develop students’ creativity in english for specific purposes. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 684–692.

Sparkleo Technologies. (2023). The Art and Science of User Interface Design — 2023. Medium.

Tamsah, H., Ilyas, J. B., & Yusriadi, Y. (2021). Hasan Aydin Create Teaching Creativity through Training Management, Effectiveness Training, and Teacher Quality in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(4), 18–35.

Uthayasankar Sivarajah, Zahir Irani, & Vishanth Weerakkody. (2015). Evaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 473–487.

Xian, L. C., Ibrahim, N., Azmi, N. H., Saari, E. M., & Razali, F. M. (2021). The Development of an Augmented Reality Game KANJI Write for Beginners. Journal of ICT in Education, 8(2), 79–92.

Xiaojing Gu, Ap Dijksterhuis, & Simone M. Ritter. (2019). Fostering children’s creative thinking skills with the 5-I training program. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 32, 92–101.

Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Elvira Ismagilova, D. Laurie Hughes, Jamie Carlson, Raffaele Filieri, Jenna Jacobson, Varsha Jain, Heikki Karjaluoto, Hajer Kefi, Anjala S. Krishen, Vikram Kumar, Mohammad M. Rahman, Ramakrishnan Raman, Philipp A., Rauschnabel, Jennifer Rowley, Jari Salo, Gina A. Tran, & Yichuan Wang. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59.

Yogeswary Kuppusamy, & Helmi Norman. (2021). Kemahiran teknologi dan kesediaan melaksanakan pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan dalam talian semasa era pandemik dalam kalangan guru di sekolah rendah tamil. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(1), 428–441.




How to Cite

Ibrahim, N., Chandra, A. Y., Saari, E. M., Prasetyaningrum, P. T., & Pratama, I. (2023). The Effectiveness of Web 2.0 Tools Training Workshop Using Canva and Figma in Developing Creative Visual Content. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 35–45.