Content Analysis and Continuity of the Time and Time Topics in National Primary School (SK) Mathematics Textbooks Year 1 to Year 6
Analisis Kandungan dan Kesinambungan Topik Masa dan Waktu dalam Buku Teks Matematik Sekolah Rendah Kebangsaan (SK) Tahun 1 hingga Tahun 6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol13.1.9.2023Keywords:
SK Mathematics Textbook, time, content analysis, mathematical and contextual aspects, ContinuityAbstract
Textbooks are materials that have important benefits in the implementation of the teaching and facilitation process (PdPc). Previous studies have found that textbooks are used as a medium and the main guide in the teaching process by teachers as well as the main reference in learning by students. Therefore, the content of quality textbooks is important to create a quality education system and human capital. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyze the content of the topic Time and Time as well as the continuity of the topic in Mathematics Textbooks Year 1 to Year 6 of the National School (SK). This survey-type study is carried out quantitatively. The results of the study show that the Year 1 to Year 6 Mathematics Textbook has a total of 546 questions including sample questions and exercises. There are two aspects that are studied, namely the mathematical aspect that refers to the calculation of solution steps and the contextual aspect that focuses on the method of presenting examples and exercises. This study has also analyzed the continuity of the topic from Year 1 to Year 6. The findings show that the content of the topic from Year 1 to Year 5 has a more significant continuity because the Year 6 topic introduces a new topic which is time zone. The findings of this study are expected to provide extensive and clear knowledge to teachers and readers about the content of the topic of time and time in the National School Mathematics Textbook. At the same time, research can also be used as a guide in planning the teaching and learning process. The suggestion for further research is to carry out an analysis of the level of questions for this topic so that high-level thinking skills for this topic can be mastered by the students.
Downloads
References
Asri, L., Oktalidiasari, D., & Darmawijoyo. (2020). Students’ perception of reading and understanding mathematics textbook. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1).
Asyrani, A. S., & Roslinda, R. (2020). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of primary school mathematics textbook. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 286- 293
Gloria, S. (2019). Children’s understanding of time: A study in a primary history classroom. History Education Research Journal, 16(1): 158-173
Guan, Y.T & Roslinda, R. (2021). Analisis Kandungan Topik Ruang dalam Buku Teks Matematik KSSR Semakan 2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol12.2.7.2022
Hwang, S., Yeo, S., & Son, T. (2021). A comparative analysis of fraction addition and subtraction contents in the mathematics textbooks in the U.S. and South Korea. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 511-521
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 1. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 2. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 3. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 4. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 5. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2021). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 6. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.2307/749754
Lim. C.Y & Roslinda. R. (2021). Analisis Contoh dan Latihan bagi Topik Penambahan dan Penolakkan dalam Buku Teks Matematik SJKC. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH). 6(9): 254-270.
Loewen, J. W. (2018). Teaching what really happened: How to avoid the tyranny of textbooks and get students excited about doing history. Teachers College Press.
Lusiana, R., & Andari, T. (2019). Developing an algebra textbook based on problem solving to improve student' learning achievement. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i2.4906 [ 4 April 2022]
Mohd, S.O, Noor, S.S & Mohd, U.D (2017). Penggunaan Bahan Bnatu Mengajar Guru Matematik Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol7.no1.3.2017 [ 4 April 2022]
Nooraini. A.J & Roslinda. R. (2021). Perbandingan Topik Nombor dan Operasi dalam Kurikulum Matematik Menengah Rendah antara Malaysia dan Korea Selatan. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Peringkat Kebangsaan Tahun 2021 (SPeK21).
Nur. A.A. & Roslinda.R. (2021). Analisis Knadungan Topik Tambah dan Tolak dalam Buku Teks Matematik Thaap 1 Sekolah Kebangsaan. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan 3(1): 394-405.
Pei, L., Shang, J., & Ma, Y. (2016). The comparative study of exercises in two versions of mathematics textbooks for Chinese elementary schools: A case study of number, addition and subtraction within 20. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 36(6), 68-75.
Robert. F.P & Amnah.A. (2017). Komunikasi dan Kefahaman Maklumat Saintifik dalam Buku Teks Sains Sekolah Rendah: Satu Kajian Kes tenatang Kaedah Penyampaian. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia. 42(2)
Tan, K. J., Ismail, Z., & Abidin, M. (2018). A comparative analysis on cognitive domain for the malaysian primary four textbook series. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1273-1286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/82625
Yeasmin, N., & Uusiautti, S. (2018). Finland and Singapore: Two different top countries of PISA and the challenge of providing equal opportunities to immigrant students. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS), 16(1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vidhya Subrahim, Roslinda Rosli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
