The Effectiveness of Critical Thinking in Improving Skills in KBAT Problem Solving

Keberkesanan Pemikiran Kritis dalam Meningkatkan Kemahiran dalam Penyelesaian Masalah KBAT

Authors

  • Siti Sarah Muhammad Raflee Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, MALAYSIA
  • Lilia Halim Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.1.6.2021

Keywords:

Higher Order Thinking Skills, HOTS, Problem Solving

Abstract

Higher order thinking skills (HOTS) have been implemented in classroom assessment. HOTS is often associated with high level problem solving questions. However, researchers found that the solution to the problem of HOTS is still at a moderate level among students. Therefore, a study to look at the effectiveness of critical thinking in problem solving HOTS was conducted at the school level. The three special objectives of this study are (i) to identify items that are difficult for students to answer, (ii) to identify the causes of students having difficulty mastering HOTS problem solving and (iii) to see students' achievement in solving HOTS questions after Cungkil + Cetus Method intervention Trigger executed. The study design used was action research. The sample consisting of sampling was intended to involve Form three students who were weak or failed in classroom assessments for Science subjects. The Cungkil + Cetus method is used in the teacher's teaching method to guide students to solve HOTS problems systematically and effectively. To see the changes in students' solutions to problems in the form of HOTS after using the Cungkil + Cetus Method, data were collected through a comparison of pre -test and post -test, observation notes through diary entries and semi -structured interviews. The findings of the study show that the students are still weak in mastering the questions in the form of making inferences and predictions. Several causes of weak students when answering HOTS questions were identified, namely lack of confidence in answering HOTS questions, assuming that HOTS questions are difficult and assuming that HOTS questions require a long answer. The pre -test and post -test findings showed an increase in Science assessment achievement of 40%. This is supported by the results of the interviews which showed that students were more confident to answer the HOTS questions when guided by friends and teachers. The results of this study are expected to contribute to teaching and learning in the classroom as well as to improve the practice of teachers in helping students solve the problem of HOTS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arni Yuzie Mohd Arshad et.al. (2015). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Murid Dalam Konteks.

Azizi et al. (2007). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Teori, Analisis & Interpretasi Data. PTS Profesional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Dokumen Standard Kurikulum Dan Pentaksiran Sains Tahun 6. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Bahagian Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2016). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Sains Tingkatan 2. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Barrows, H. S. (1998). The essentials of problem-based learning. Journal of Dental Education, 62 (9) : 630-633.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

Fatin Aliah Phang et al. (2014). Faktor Penyumbang Kepada Kemerosotan Penyertaan Pelajar dalam Aliran Sains: Satu Analisis Sorotan Tesis. Sains Humanika 2:4:63–71. www.sainshumanika.utm.my | e-ISSN ISSN: 2289-6996

Hava E. Vidergor. (2018). Keberkesanan Model Kurikulum Multidimensi dalam Membangunkan kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Pelajar dan Menengah. The Curriculum Journal,29 issue 1.

Iskandar. (2008). Metadologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial (Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif). Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.

Ismail B. Kailani & Khairuzaman Bin Ismail. (2007). Mengenal Pasti Faktor-Faktor Yang Menyebabkan Pelajar Kurang Cemerlang Dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains. Satu Kajian Tinjauan Di Sebuah Sekolah Menengah Luar Bandar. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Journal (AEARJ) ISSN 2289-3180/ 4.

Kamal P.A. (2017). Exploring Critical Thinking for Secondary Level Students In Chemistry: From Insight To Practice. Journal of Advanced College of Engineering and Management 3.

Kamus Dewan. (2010). Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka:

Kelli Allen, Jeanne scheve dan Vicki Nieter. (2011). Understanding Learning Styles (Making a difference for diverse learners. Shell Education.

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2008). Buku Manual Kajian Tindakan Edisi Ketiga. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan.Kuala Lumpur.

Lyman, F. (1981). The Responsive Classroom Discussion. In A. S. Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming Digest (pp. 109-113). College Park, MD: University of Maryland College of Education.

M. Kaviza. (2019). Kesan Kaedah Flipped Classroom Dengan Teknik Peer Instruction Terhadap Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis. Journal of Social Science dan Humanities, 16(5):1-12.

Marlina binti Ali dan Shaharom bin Noordin. (2006). Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis Di Kalangan Pelajar pendidikan Fizik Merentas Jantina. Buletin Persatuan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Johor Jilid 15 Bil. 1 Tahun.

Marlina binti Ali dan Shaharom bin Noordin. (2010). Hubungan Antara Kemahiran Berfikir Kritisdengan Pencapaian Akademik Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 52 Mei 2010: 45–55.

Mazli Sham Abdullah dan Saemah Rahman. (2014). Gaya Pembelajaran Dan Kesedaran Metakognitif dalam Kalangan Pelajar Aliran Sains. Proceeding of the Social Sciences Research ICSSR 2014

Meor Ibrahim Bin Kamaruddin & Nor Ashikin Binti Mohd Razali. (2008). Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Membina Inferens Dan Mentafsir Data Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Satu, Dua Dan Empat Program Kimia Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Muda, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Mohamad Ariffin Abu Bakar dan Norulhuda Ismail. (2019). Impak Pelaksanaan Strategi Pembelajaran Regulasi Metakognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Matematik: Satu Kajian Literatur. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan e-ISSN: 2682-826X | Vol.1, No. 1, 18-26, 2019

Mohamed Ali Haniffa et al. (2019). Problem Based Learning Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Kursus Kenegaraan Malaysia Di Universiti Utara Malaysia. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4 (32), 351-366.

Mohammad Reza Sadeghi. (2012). Action Research in Reflective Teaching. Journal of Social and Political Sciences 1(4): 71-76. Retrieved from http//www.basicresearchjournals.org

Mohd Adnan Kaus et al. (2015). Metod Pengajaran Guru Bagi Meningkatkan Kemahiran Menyelesaikan Masalah Dalam Fizik. 2ND IEPS2015 International Education Postgraduate Seminar 2015: Proceedings. Volume 2: ‘Inspiring Young Researcer’ / Organiser: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. ISBN 978-967-12174-8-1:83-86

Mohd Nazri Hassan et al. (2017). Pembangunan Modul Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi di dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains Sekolah Rendah: Analisis Keperluan Guru. Sains Humanika 9: 1-5 (2017) 119–125.

Noor Anida Awang, Rahimah Embong, Zaiton Mustafa, dan Azhar Yaacob. (2014). Strategi Pembelajaran Bersama Rakan Sebaya Untuk Meningkatkan Kemahiran Bertutur Bahasa Arab Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Bukan Penutur Jati Di Unisza. Prosiding Seminar Pengajaran & Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab.

Nor Hasnida Che Md Ghazali et al. (2010). Kemahiran Pemikiran Kritikal Dan Penyelesaian Masalah Pelajar-Pelajar Sains. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Negara Kali Ke-4 / 450-462.

Norzeliana Idris, Saniah Sembak dan Nor Hasnida Ghazali. (2011). Kesedaran Metakognisi dan Pemahaman Konsep dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik. National Academic Conference (ENRICH 2011). Universiti Teknologi MARA Kelantan.

Nur Laili Binti Lockman. (2008). Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Meramal Dan Kemahiran Mengawal Pembolehubah Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Pendidikan Kimia. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Nursafra Mohd Zhaffar et al. (2017). Elemen Pemikiran Kritis Dalam Konteks Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. ASEAN Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilization (ACER-J) 1(2): 92-101. eISSN: 2600-769X.

Ong Eng Tek & Bibi Hazliana Mohd Hassan. (2019). Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses Sains Asas Dalam Kalangan Murid Sekolah Rendah Di Selangor Berdasarkan Jantina, Lokasi Sekolah dan Aras Tahun. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 3(2), 77-90. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JPSMM/article/view/2119

Othman Lebar. (2011). Kajian Tindakan dalam Pendidikan: Teori dalam Pendidikan. UPSI.

Quek Miow Leng. (2006). Hubungan Antara Sikap, Minat, Pengajaran Guru Dan Pengaruh Rakan Sebaya Dengan Pencapaian Matematik Di Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Di Daerah Batu Pahat, Johor.Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Muda, UTM

Santos, L.F. (2017). The Role of Critical Thinking in Science Education. Journal of Education and Practice 8 (20). www.iiste.org.

Shahabuddin Hashim et al. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. PTS Profesional: Kuala Lumpur.

Shazaitul Azreen Rodzalan & Maisarah Mohamed Saat. (2015). The Perception of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill among Malaysian Undergraduate Students. Social and Behavioral Sciences 172: 725 – 732. Diterbitkan oleh Elsevier.

Siti Rahayah Ariffin dan Nor Azaheen Abdul Hamid. (2009). Profil Kemahiran Pemikiran Kritikal Antara Pelajar Aliran Sains Dan Bukan Sains. Malaysian Education Dean’s Council Journal. June.Volume 3,20‐27.

Siti Rahayah Ariffin et al. (2010). Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Pemikiran Kritikal dan penyelesaian Masalah Pelajar-Pelajar Sains dan hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Pelajar. UKM, Bangi.

Sulaiman, M. (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan Dan Panduan Penulisan: Esei, Proposal, Tesis. Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

Unknown. (2018). Analisis Pencapaian PT3. SMK Puchong Utama (1).

Veknaswari Subramaniam, Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob, Hapini Awang. 2019. Kesan Think pair share terhadap pencapaian dan sikap murid dalam mata pelajaran matematik. Journal Of Educational Research And Indigenous Studies vol 2(1). Univesiti Utara Malaysia.

Zhang, L.F. (2004). Predicting cognitive development, intellectual styles, and personality traits from selfrated abilities, Learning and Individual Differences 15 pp.67–88.

Zuriawahida Binti Zulkifli. (2016). Keberkesanan Kaedah Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah Dalam Meningkatkan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Dan Menyelesaikan Masalah Dalam Kalangan Pelajar. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

Published

2021-05-28

How to Cite

Muhammad Raflee, S. S., & Halim, L. (2021). The Effectiveness of Critical Thinking in Improving Skills in KBAT Problem Solving: Keberkesanan Pemikiran Kritis dalam Meningkatkan Kemahiran dalam Penyelesaian Masalah KBAT. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.1.6.2021