Analisa ‘Course Learning Outcome Monitoring’ bagi kursus Matematik dalam Kejuruteraan

Analysis of ‘Course Learning Outcome Monitoring’ for Mathematics in Engineering Course

Authors

  • Abu Bakar Ibrahim Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
  • Mohd Fadhil Harfiez Abdul Mutalib Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
  • Yusri Abdullah Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
  • Mad Helmi Ab. Majid Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
  • Sumayyah Dzulkifly Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Keywords:

CLOM, Matematik Kejuruteraan

Abstract

Kajian ini adalah bertujuan untuk menganalisa nilai Course Learning Outcomes Monitoring (CLOM) bagi kursus matematik dalam kejuruteraan bagi program Ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan (Teknologi Reka Bentuk Berkomputer) di Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk melihat kesan indeks CLOM bagi pembelajaran dan pengajaran yang telah ditetapkan. Selain itu, objektif kajian adalah untuk mengenalpasti kaedah penilaian yang sesuai bagi meningkatkan nilai indek CLOM. Keputusan analisa menunjukkan bahawa nilai CLOM bagi sesi 2019/2020 adalah 63.17% berbanding dengan nilai indek CLOM yang diperoleh bagi sesi 2020/2021 iaitu 73.12%. Ini menunjukkan bahawa terdapat peningkatan nilai CLOM sebanyak 9.95% bagi sesi 2020/2021. Walaupun begitu nilai indek CLOM ini masih perlu diperbaiki supaya mencapai tahap yang lebih berkesan iaitu 75% dan keatas. Oleh itu, boleh dirumuskan bahawa prestasi bagi setiap penilaian yang dilakukan akan memberikan kesan secara langsung kepada nilai indek CLOM bagi sesuatu kursus.

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to analyze the value of Course Learning Outcomes Monitoring (CLOM) ​​for mathematics in engineering course for the Bachelor of Education (Computerized Design Technology) program at the Faculty of Arts, Computers and Creative Industries, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. The objective of this study was to look at the effect of the CLOM index for predetermined learning and teaching. In addition, the other objective was to identify appropriate valuation methods to increase the value of the CLOM index. The results of the analysis show that the value of CLOM for the 2019/2020 session was 63.17% compared to the value of the CLOM index obtained for the 2020/2021 session which was 73.12%. This indicates that there was an increase in CLOM value of 9.95% for the 2020/2021 session. However, the value of the CLOM index still needs to be improved to reach a more effective level with value of 75% or above. Therefore, it can be concluded that the performance of each assessment performed has a direct impact on the value of the CLOM index for a course.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Desa, S., Nor’ashiqin Mohd Idrus, R. O., & Khalid, K. (2012). Assessing students’learning outcomes achievement using CLOM system as a potential indicator for teaching and learning improvement platform. Dalam Edulearn12: 4th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 414-421).

Hamidy, A., & Merliza, P. (2019). The influence of achievement motivation and self-regulated learning (SRL) on students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Tarbiyah Wa Ta'lim: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.21093/twt.v6i2.2047

Handayani, R. (2018). The effect of problem based learning and expository toward learning outcomes of christian education course. Studies in Comparative Education, 2, https://doi.org/10.31499/2306- 5532.2.2018.153406

Ismail, A., Ariffin, S.A., Hashim, H., Yatim, M.H.M. (2020). The impact of community-based fieldwork on affective domains among software engineering undergraduates. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(7). 1177-1187. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I7/PR270109

Jamal, M., Kaspin, K., Mohd Nor, N., Marzuki, M., Abdul Rahman, M., & Ramlie, H. (2021). The effectiveness of volunteer education among students of Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) enhances soft skills values. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 6(39), 208-222, https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.6390014

Jayant J.P., Swapnil H. P., & Nilesh, C. G. (2020). Enhancement of learning outcomes by using active learning technique for Engineering Graphics course. International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management,6(1), 23-25. https://doi.org/10.35291/2454-9150.2020.0249

Mahajan, M., & Singh, M. (2017). Importance and benefits of learning outcomes. IOSR Journal of Humanities and SocialScience, 22(03), 65-67. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2203056567

Waluyo, B. (2020). Learning outcomes of a general english course implementing multiple e-learning technologies and active learning concepts. The Journal of Asiatefl, 17(1), 160-181. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.1.10.160

Zaharon Lai, Z. S., & Rosli, A. N. (2021). Keberkesanan penggunaan video pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu dalam kalangan murid tahun 6 semasa pengajaran dan pembelajaran di rumah (PdPR). Journal of ICT in Education, 8(3), 76-99. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol8.sp.1.7.2021

Zitar, R., EL-Hassan, A., & AL-Sahlee, O. (2019). Deep learning recommendation system for course learning outcomes assessment. Journal Of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(10-SPECIAL ISSUE), 1491-1478. https://doi.org/10.5373/jardcs/v11sp10/20192993

Downloads

Published

2021-12-24

How to Cite

Ibrahim, A. B., Mutalib, M. F. H. A., Abdullah, Y., Majid, M. H. A., & Dzulkifly, S. (2021). Analisa ‘Course Learning Outcome Monitoring’ bagi kursus Matematik dalam Kejuruteraan: Analysis of ‘Course Learning Outcome Monitoring’ for Mathematics in Engineering Course. Journal of ICT in Education, 8(4), 64–70. Retrieved from https://ojs.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JICTIE/article/view/6241