Articulation and implementation of professional standards for teachers in teacher education institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol13.2.8.2023Keywords:
articulation and implementation, beginning teacher indicators, PPST, professional standards for teachers, teacher qualityAbstract
This study determined the constructions of administrators and teachers in the articulation and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST) in teacher education institutions. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed to explore the narratives of the 20 purposively selected participants from the five higher education institutions in Cebu. Coding and categorization of participants' vignettes, following Clarke and Braun's (2014) thematic analysis model, resulted in five indexed themes: neediness not readiness, tenacity, and supportability, challenged but not frustrated, receptivity and positivity, and responsibility and accountability. Points of convergence and divergence were also identified from the TEIs articulation and implementation of PPST. The rationalization attached to integrating the beginning teacher indicators in the teacher education curriculum provides input on establishing contextualized, professional development initiatives for teacher quality. As such, forging partnerships between and among teacher education institutions through curriculum quality audits may be considered.
Downloads
References
Alugar, R. B., & Itaas, E. C. (2021). Exploring the implementation of curriculum quality audit in a Philippine State University. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1620-1639. https://ijci.globets.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/462
Amimo, C. A., Bosire, J., & Role, E. (2014). Theoretical underpinnings of curriculum change in developing economies: Is complexity theory the new wine in Lewins’ old wineskin? International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(3), 38-49. https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarpe/v3y2014i3p38-49.html
Bates, C., & Morgan, D. N. (2018). Seven Elements of Effective Professional Development. ResearchGate; Wiley.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323370382_Seven_Elements_of_Effective_Professional_Development
Bacus, R. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs, praxes, and post-method pedagogy in English language teaching. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(1), 86-102. https://doi.org/kp3d
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977-1002. https://doi.org/czrbnx
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1947-1952). Springer. https://doi.org/gwsw
Conway, P. F., & Clark, C. M. (2003). The journey inward and outward: A re-examination of fuller's concerns-based model of teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(5), 465-482. https://doi.org/cmhv9m
Cresdee. M. (2002). Dealing with curriculum change: How teachers perceive recent curriculum changes and the strategies they employ to cope with such change [Master’s thesis, Murdoch University]. Murdoch University Research Portal. file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/02Whole.pdf
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-brief
Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Criteria for an Effective Teacher Evaluation System. American Federation of Teachers. https://www.aft.org/ae/spring2014/darling-hammond_sb3
Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating Teacher Evaluation. Department of Economics, Working Paper Series; Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley. https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/econwp/qt63n8q20q.html
Fastier, M. (2016). Curriculum change, challenges and teacher responsibility. New Zealand Geographer, 72(1), 51-56. https://doi.org/kp3g
Fullan, M. (2006). Change theory: A force for school improvement [Seminar series]. Centre for Strategic Education. http://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/13396072630.pdf
Gannon, S. (2012). Changing lives and standardising teachers: The possibilities and limits of professional standards. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(3), 59-77.
Ghavifekr, S., & Wan Athirah Wan Rosdy. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191. https://www.ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/79
Goe, L., Holdheide, L., & Miller, T. (2014). Practical guide to designing comprehensive teacher evaluation systems: A tool to assist in the development of teacher evaluation systems, revised edition (ED555655). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED555655.pdf
Halah Ahmed Alismail, & McGuire, P. (2015). 21st century standards and curriculum: Current research and practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150-155. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/20055
Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019) Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support
programs help?, Policy Design and Practice, 2:1, 1-14, DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378
Ingvarson, L. (2019). Teaching standards and the promotion of quality teaching. European Journal of Education, 54(3), 337-355. https://doi.org/kp3x
Isagani R. Cruz. (2009, April 12). Education reform in the Philippines. https://isaganicruz.wordpress.com/2009/04/12/education-reform-in-the-philippines/
Jaca, C., Bacus, R., Anova, M, & Labarrete, R. (2018). Thematic analysis of selected published researches in curriculum and instruction, International Journal of education and Research, 6(10), https://www.ijern.com/journal/2018/October-2018/04.pdf
Laska, L. (2016). Monitoring and evaluating the performance of teachers through the process of observation in the classroom. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(2), 370-378. https://doi.org/kp3z
Lee, T., Cheng, Y. C., & Ko, J. (2018). Curriculum reform with a school-based approach: Intellectual, structural and cultural challenges. School Leadership & Management, 38(3), 278-301. https://doi.org/kp32
LeTendre, G. K., & Wiseman, A. W. (2015). Introduction: The challenges of teacher effectiveness and quality worldwide. Promoting and Sustaining a Quality Teacher Workforce, 27, 1-38. https://doi.org/kp33
Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Amaël Arguel, & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding Difficulties and Resulting Confusion in Learning: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049
Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Preservice teachers’ objectives and their experience of practical work. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 9, 1-17. https://doi.org/gctkxx
Quasimundo, T. (2011). DepEd readies K +12 curricula for next year. Philippine Daily Inquirer. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/71693/deped-readies-k12-curricula-for-next-year
Republic of the Philippines Department of Education. (2017). National adoption and implementation of the Philippine professional standards for teachers (DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017). https://rb.gy/4tyn6
Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475-514. https://doi.org/fcvs
Singh, P., Allen, J., & Rowan, L. (2019). Quality teaching: Standards, professionalism, practices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/kp35
Stein, D., & Valters, C. (2012). Understanding theory of change in international development. The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/56359
Steiner, J. (2020). Implications of a standards-based curriculum for the teaching-learning assessment process (EJ618169). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ618169
Syed Talib Hussain, Shen, L., Tayyaba Akram, Muhammad Jamal Haider, Syed Hadi Hussain, & Muhammad Ali. (2018). Kurt Lewin's change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123-127. https://doi.org/gg4gv7
Tandon, P., & Tsuyoshi, F. (2015). Educating the next generation: Improving teacher quality in Cambodia. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/kp39
Tuchaai, T., O'neill, M., & Sharplin, E. (2012). Adapting to curriculum change: A theoretical framework informing the design and implementation of a curriculum intervention. English in Education, 46(2), 155-174. https://doi.org/kp38
Utami Widiati, & Nur Hayati. (2015). Teacher professional education in Indonesia and ASEAN 2015: Lessons learned From English language teacher education programs. In R. Stroupe & K. Kimura (Eds.), ASEAN integration and the role of English language teaching: Special edition (pp. 121-148). CamTESOL. https://doi.org/kp3w
Vasquez-Martinez, C. -R., Giron, G., De-La-Luz-Arellano, I., & Ayon-Bañuelos, A. (2013). The effects of educational reform (ED567169). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED567169.pdf
Voltz, D. L., Sims, M. J., & Nelson, B. (2010). Connecting teachers, students and standards: Strategies for success in diverse and inclusive classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Wedell, M., Grassick, L., Wedell, M., & Grassick, L. (2018). Living with curriculum change: An overview. In International perspectives on teachers living with curriculum change (pp. 1-12). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/kp37
Yinger, R. J. (1999). The role of standards in teaching and teacher education. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 100(5), 85-113. https://doi.org/kp36
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Remedios C. Bacus, Rita May P. Tagalog
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
