The development of an Investigable Questions Formulation Technique (IQFT) in open inquiry learning

Pembangunan Investigable Questions Formulation Technique (IQFT) dalam pembelajaran inkuiri terbuka

Authors

  • Norsyazwani Muhamad Dah Sekolah Menengah Agama Repah, Tampin, Negeri Sembilan, MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Syafiq Aiman Mat Noor UCL Institute of Education, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UNITED KINGDOM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.1.10.2021

Keywords:

Investigable questions, Problem solving, Inquiry-based learning, Open inquiry, Secondary school science

Abstract

Investigable questions are a fundamental element in open inquiry learning, which allow pupils to plan and implement an investigation by themselves. However, creating investigable questions is a complex process and requires a systematic approach. Therefore, this action research was conducted in an effort to improve teacher-researcher practice in guiding form one pupils to create their own investigable questions. This paper seeks to answer the following research question: How can teacher-researcher develop the Investigable Questions Formulation Technique (IQFT) in open inquiry learning to guide pupils to create investigable questions? IQFT, as an intervention developed in this study, comprises eight main steps, designed through two cycles, and involving the processes of: (i) planning action, (ii) taking action, (iii) collecting and analysing data and (iv) reflecting. Data collected included unstructured observations, photographs and pupils’ written works. Data were analysed narratively, by describing how teacher-researcher have developed IQFT in an effort of guiding pupils to create investigable questions in open inquiry learning. One of the main lessons teacher-researcher have learned as a result of designing and implementing this study is that the process of guiding pupils to create investigable questions needs to incorporate adequate training for pupils, especially when the teacher introduces new techniques such as IQFT to pupils. In addition, teacher-researcher have realised that a particular educational or pedagogical theory only serves as the basis of a teacher’s knowledge and needs to be adapted and modified according to the teaching context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allan, F., Herbert, A., Peter, P., & Bridget, S. (2018). Teachers Investigate Their Work. Teachers Investigate Their Work. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315398822

Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying Inquiry Instruction. The Science Teacher, 30–33.

Brown G., Leonard G., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2016). Writing SMARTER goals for professional learning and improving classroom practices. Reflective Practice, 17(5), 621-635. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1187120

Chin, C. (2002). Open investigations in science: posing problems and asking investigative questions. Teaching and Learning, 23(2), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514022000030499

Chin, C., & Osborne, C. (2008). Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101

Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002). Posing problems for open investigations: What questions do pupils ask? Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514022000030499

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through students’ questions: Case studies in science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530036

Dillon, J. T. (1988). The Remedial Status of Student Questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027880200301

Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers Inhibiting Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Potential Solutions: Perceptions of Positively Inclined Early Adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5

Harrak, F., Bouchet, F., & Luengo, V. (2019). From Students’ Questions to Students’ Profiles in a Blended Learning Environment. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(1), 54—84. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.61.4

Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781452226644

Jacques, L. A., Cian, H., Herro, D. C., & Quigley, C. (2020). The Impact of Questioning Techniques on STEAM Instruction. Action in Teacher Education, 42(3), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R., (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer

Keys, C. W. (1998). A study of grade six pupils generating questions and plans for open-ended science investigations. Research in Science Education, 28(3), 301-316. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02461565

Laronde, G., & MacLeod, K. (2012). Modeling various teaching methods in a faculty of education in science education: Chalk and talk, virtual labs or hovercrafts. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 9(2), 107-114

Li, W. S. S., & Arshad, M. Y. (2015). Inquiry Practices in Malaysian Secondary Classroom and Model of Inquiry Teaching Based on Verbal Interaction. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12, 151-175. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2015.12.8

Lock, R. (1990). Open-ended, problem-solving investigations. School Science Review, 71(256), 63-72

McNiff, J. (2007). My story is my living educational theory. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 308–329). Sage Publications Ltd

McNiff, J. (2017). Action research: All you need to know. Sage Publications Ltd

Ministry of Education Malaysia [MOE]. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to post-secondary education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem-solving. NJ: Prentice Hall

Nik Yusuf, N. A., Abdullah, N., & Mohamed Noh, N. (2017). Scientific identity and inquiry-based teaching amongst secondary school adolescents. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 7(2), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol7.2.6.2017

Othman, I., & Md Salleh, N. (2019). Pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam pengembangan kurikulum: Kesannya ke atas penguasaan kemahiran proses sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 3(1), 60-71

Rezba, R. J., Auldridge, T., & Rhea, L. (1999). Teaching & Learning the Basic Science Skills. https://goo.gl/2JNav5

Riel, Margaret. (2010). The Center for Collaborative Action Research@Pepperdine University. Inquiry in Education, 1(1), 1-3

Rothstein, D., & Santana, L. (2017). Make just one change: Teach students to ask their own questions. Harvard Education Press

Sabu, N., Mohamed Noh, N., Che Ahmad, C. N., & Abdullah, N. (2018). Kesan ejen pedagogi dan rangsangan multimedia dalam koswer nutri-score terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 8(2), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol8.2.6.2018

Salavera, C., Usán, P., & Teruel, P. (2019). Contextual problems, emotional intelligence and social skills in Secondary Education students. Gender differences. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, 177, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2018.07.008

Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0903_1

Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2008). Defining Critical Thinking. Foundation for Critical Thinking. http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/definingCT.cfm

Shodell, M. (1995). The Classroom Student Questions as Course in Biology Curriculum is Continuous. The American Biology Teacher, 57(5), 278–281

Venema, S., & Lodge, J. M. (2013). Capturing dynamic presentation: Using technology to enhance the chalk and the talk. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 20-31

Watts, M. (1991). The science of problem-solving. London: Cassell Educational Ltd

Whitehead, J. (1989). Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind, ‘How do I improve my practice?’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 41-52

Yin Peen, T., & Yusof Arshad, M. (2014). Teacher and student questions: A case study in Malaysian secondary school problem-based learning. Asian Social Science, 10(4), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n4p174

Yoon, H. G., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9212-y

Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399

Published

2021-05-29

How to Cite

Muhamad Dah, N., & Mat Noor, M. S. A. (2021). The development of an Investigable Questions Formulation Technique (IQFT) in open inquiry learning: Pembangunan Investigable Questions Formulation Technique (IQFT) dalam pembelajaran inkuiri terbuka. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.1.10.2021