Organizational Knowledge Management as A Mediator on the Relationship Between Headmaster’s Sustainable Leadership and Teacher Innovative Work Behavior at Pahang Primary School (TS25)

Authors

  • Shahrulazman Abd Raub Malaysia Education Ministry, Putrajaya, Malaysia
  • Mahaliza Mansor Faculty of Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol17.1.4.2024

Keywords:

Organizational knowledge management, Sustainable leadership, Teaching innovative behaviour, Transformation schools 2025 (TS25).

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to test the effect of the Headmasters’ Sustainable Leadership (SL) practices, Organizational Knowledge Management (OKM), and Teachers’ Innovative Work Behaviour (TIWB). This study also tests the role of Organizational Knowledge Management practices as a mediator in the relationship between Headmasters’ Sustainable Leadership practices and Teachers’ Innovative Work Behaviour in the primary schools of Transformation School 2025 (TS25). The design of this study utilized a quantitative approach with the survey method involving a total of 318 teachers who were serving in 30 primary schools (TS25) cohorts 1, 2, and 3 in the state of Pahang. The data has been analysed by descriptive and inferential using SPSS-Amos software. The observed data met the requirements of the fit indices (RMSEA=0.06, CFI=0.94, TLI=0.93, Chisq=2.28). The findings showed that significant effect of SL practices on OKM practices (β=.69, p<.05), SL practices on TIWB practices (β=.25, p<.05), and OKM practices on TIWB practices (β=.63, p<.05). Organizational Knowledge Management practices has been identified as a full mediator in the relationship between Headmasters’ Sustainable Leadership practices and Teachers’ Innovative Work Behaviour in (TS25) schools. As a conclusion, it has been identified that the role of headmasters is crucial in practicing knowledge that relevant to the organization to support the implementation of innovative work behaviour of teachers in schools. In terms of implications, the structural equation model that has been suggested shows that Headmasters’ Sustainable Leadership practices may affect Teachers’ Innovative Work Behaviour through the application of organizational knowledge management practices in schools. This provides an indicator that courses, training, and educational leadership modules for headmasters and teachers should be planned holistically to improve the quality as well as to transform the education system in Malaysia to achieve the goals of the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, J. (2020). Impact of total quality management on corporate sustainability through the mediating effect of knowledge management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118-128.

Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R. & Eldabi, T. (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.018

Arunima, K. V., & Pakkeerappa, P. (2018). Knowledge Management in Secondary Education: A Study on Perception of School Teachers in India. Pacific Business Review International, 11(1), 109-118.

Awang, M., Ismail, R., Flett, P., & Curry, A. (2011). Knowledge management in Malaysian school education: do the smart schools do it better?. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(3), 263-282.

Azhar Harun, Abdul Ghani Sani, Indra Shahril Sayuati & Kasmah Abdullah. (2020). Kesediaan amalan kepimpinan guru di sebuah sekolah rendah di bawah program transformasi sekolah 2025 (ts25) zon sabah. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Kebangsaan, 32, 1–24. https://iab.moe.edu.my/index.php/ms/jurnal-iab

Azman Safii. (2017, May 5). Transformation School 2025 (TS25). Journal of Leadership. http://www.jprisma.com/v1/index.php/program/sekolah-transformasi-2025

Battistelli, A., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., Di Napoli, G. & Piccione, L. (2019). Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work-based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21344

Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cheng E.C.K. (2015). A Knowledge Management Model for School Development. In: Knowledge Management for School Education. Springer Briefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-233-3_7

Cheng, E.C.K. (2017). Knowledge management strategies for capitalizing on school knowledge. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47(1), pp.94-109. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2016-0045

Chu, K.W., (2016). Leading knowledge management in a secondary school. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(5), pp.1104-1147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0390

Davenport, T. & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organization management what they know. Harvard Business School Press.

Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press, New York.

Hargreaves, A. & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable Leadership. New jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Hatch, N. W., & Dyer, J. H. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 25(12), 1155-1178.

Hayes, A. F., Preacher, K. J., & Myers, T. A. (2011). Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques, 23(1), 434-65.

Hazril Izwar Ibrahim, Wan Maisara Wan Mohamad & Khairul Anuar Mohammad Shah. (2020). Investigating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Usage, Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Behavior among Engineers in Electrical and Electronic MNCs in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan, 58, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2020-58-11

Kim, M., Koo, D.-W., & Han, H.-S. (2021). Innovative behavior motivations among frontline employees: The mediating role of knowledge management. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 99, 103062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103062

Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). New York, USA: Guilford Press.

Messmann, G. Mulder, R.H., & Palonen, T. (2018). Vocational education teachers’ personal network at school as a resource for innovative work behaviour. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(3),174-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-08-2017-0069

Messmann, G., Stoffers, J., van der Heijden, B. & Mulder, R. (2017). Joint effects of job demands and job resources on vocational teachers’ innovative work behaviour. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1948-1961. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/PR-03-2016-0053

Messmann, G. & Mulder, R.H. (2014). Exploring the role of target specificity in the facilitation of vocational teachers’ innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1),80–101. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/joop.12035

Messmann, G. & Mulder, R. H. (2010). Innovative Work Behaviour in Vocational Colleges: Understanding How and Why Innovations Are Developed. Journal of Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9049-y

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysian Education Development Plan (2013-2025). https://www.moe.gov.my/index.php/muat- turun/penerbitan-dan-jurnal/1818-pelan-pembangunan-pendidikan-2013-2025/file

Omigie, C. A., Ikenwe, I. J., & Idhalama, O. U. (2019). The role of knowledge management for education in Nigeria. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(1), 20-23. http://10.25081/imrj.2019.v9.5496

Palazzeschi, L., Bucci, O., & Di Fabio, A. (2018). Re-Thinking Innovation In Organizations In The Industry 4.0 Scenario: New Challenges In A Primary Prevention Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(30),1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.00030

Park, S. & Kim, E.-J. (2018). Fostering organizational learning through leadership and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22 (6), 1408–1423. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0467

Payal, R., Ahmed, S., & Debnath, R.M. (2016). Knowledge management and organizational performance: a study in the context of Indian software companies. IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(4).

Rosnah Ishak, Ghani, M. F. A., & Saedah Siraj. (2017). Leadership practices of learning organisations in Malaysia's high-performing schools. JuPiDi: Journal of Educational Leadership, 1(2), 1-12.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research method for business: a skill building approach (5th ed.). New Jersey, USA: Wiley Publishing.

Sana Rehman, Abdul Sami, Aniqa Haroon & Asmara Irfan. (2019). Impact Of Sustainable Leadership Practices on Public Sector Organizations: A Systematic Review of Past Decade. Journal of Public Value and Administration Insights, 2(3), 1-5. https:// doi.org/10.31580/jpvai.v2i3.927

Schuckert, M., Kim, T.T., Paek, S. & Lee, G. (2018). Motivate To Innovate: How Authentic and Transformational Leaders Influence Employees’ Psychological Capital and Service Innovation Behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30, 776-796. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2016-0282

Solana, S. & Rosa M.E. (2020). Innovative Work Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale for Teachers. Acta De Investigación Psicológica, 10 (3),112-125. https://doi.org/10.22201/fpsi.20074719e.2020.3.363

Supermane, S., & Tahir, L.M., (2018). An overview of knowledge management practice among teachers. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(8), 616-631. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-08-2017-0065

Tahir Noaman Abdullatif, Husna Johari & Zurina Adnan. (2016). The Impact of Psychological Empowerment on Innovative Work Behavior Moderating by Quality Culture. European Journal of Business and Management, 8,1905-1925. https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v2i1.21

Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T. & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a Model of Explaining Teachers’ Innovative Behavior. Review of Educational Research, 85, 430–471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949

Usmanova, N., Yang, J., Sumarliah, E., Khan, S.U. & Khan, S.Z. (2020). Impact Of Knowledge Sharing On Job Satisfaction And Innovative Work Behavior: The Moderating Role Of Motivating Language. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(3), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-11-2019-0177

Valacherry, A. K., & Pakkeerappa, P. (2021). Knowledge Management and Academic Performance in Indian Public Schools. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.19.1.2343

Widodo, W., & Irvandi Gustari. (2020). Teacher's Innovative Behavior in Indonesian School: The Role of Knowledge Management, Creativity and OCB. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 4784-4791. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081050

World Economic Forum. (2020, January 14). Schools of the Future Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Dicapai daripada http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Schools_of_the_Future_Report_2019.pdf

Zainudin Awang. (2015). Postgraduate Research Proposal: A Step by Step Guide In Writing Proposals For Postgraduate Students (1st ed). MPWS Rich Publication Sdn Bhd.

Zuraidah Zainol. (2018). Strucutral Equation Modeling Using AMOS; A Step By Step Approach. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-18

How to Cite

Abd Raub, S., & Mansor, M. (2024). Organizational Knowledge Management as A Mediator on the Relationship Between Headmaster’s Sustainable Leadership and Teacher Innovative Work Behavior at Pahang Primary School (TS25). Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 17(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol17.1.4.2024

Issue

Section

Articles