Assessing content validity of preschool teacher's creative teaching instrument for children's language arts: A Study based on CFTI (Creativity Fostering Teacher Index) using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR)

Authors

  • Nur Atiqah Mat Saberi Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Nor Mashitah Mohd Radzi Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Chee Luen Loy Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol16.sp2.14.2023

Keywords:

Instrument, Creative teaching of preschool teachers, Content Validity Ratio, Expert

Abstract

Creative teaching is one of the important aspects in the process of teaching and learning language arts in preschool. Accordingly, this study aims to test the aspect of content validity of preschool teachers' creative teaching instrument for children's language arts in Malaysia using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) method. The goal is to ensure that the measurement instrument is suitable for use in the context of children's language arts. The study was conducted through written and online questionnaire surveys. Fifteen experts consisting of professional experts and field experts were selected through a purposive sampling technique. These experts possess expertise in early childhood education and children's language arts. The validity process of the instrument involved 56 items with three main constructs. Based on the quantitative findings of the study, it was found that the instrument has good content validity with 50 items reaching the minimum level of CVR value (N=15, CVRcritical = 0.506). Six items that do not reach the minimum CVR value improved. All 56 remaining items were refined as the final instrument. The findings of the study also demonstrated that this instrument is relevant and has the potential to be an effective tool for measuring creative teaching among preschool teachers. It is recommended that a pilot study be conducted and the data analyzed using statistical analysis such as the Rasch Model, to provide a more in-depth analysis of the items.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab. Jawas, S., & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Amalan pengajaran kreatif guru Pendidikan Islam bagi murid berkeperluan khas masalah pembelajaran [Creative teaching practices by Islamic Education teachers for students with learning disabilities]. International Journal of Islamic and Humanities Research, 2(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://nunjournal.com/index.php/qalam/article/view/50/49

Abdullah, M., Md Nor, M., & Hutagalung, F. D. (2021). Pendekatan pengajaran bermain di bilik darjah dalam kalangan guru prasekolah [Play-based teaching approach in the classroom among preschool teachers]. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 39, 64–74.

Abu Bakar, K., & Hassan, S. A. (2009). Applying the Rasch Model in educational researches. In F. Abd Rahman, F. Piee@Shafiee, & H. Elias (Eds.), Teachers learning curriculum innovations and knowledge applications (pp. 111–127). UPM Press.

Ali, A., & Mahamod, Z. (2015). Development of play-based instruction module for teaching preschoolers’ language skills. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(34), 110–118.

Ariffin, S. R. (2008). Inovasi dalam pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Brinkman, W. P. (2009). Design of a questionnaire instrument. In W. P. Brinkman (Ed.), Handbook of mobile technology research methods (pp. 31–57). Nova Publishers.

Bujang, G. R., & Subet, F. (2021). Bahan pengajaran-pembelajaran Seni Bahasa: Analisis makna dengan semantik inkuisitif [Language arts teaching-learning materials: Analysis of meaning with inquisitive semantics, PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349198533_Tajuk_Bahan_pengajaran pembelajaran_Seni_Bahasa_Analisis_Makna_dengan_Semantik_Inkuisitif

Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (1993). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, and utilization (2nd ed.). W. B. Saunders Company.

Bush, C. T. (1985). Nursing research. Reston Publishing Company.

Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M., & Sturman, E. (2012). Psychological testing and assessment: and introduction of test and measurement (8th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Ebel, R. L. (1967). Evaluating content validity. In D. A. Payne & R. F. McMorris (Eds.), Educational and psychological measurement: Contributions to theory and practice (pp. 85–94). Blaisdell Publishing Company.

George, N., Barrett, N., McPeake, L., Goett, R., Anderson, K., & Baird, J. (2015). Content validation of a novel screening tool to identify emergency department patients with significant palliative care needs. Academic Emergency Medicine, 22(7), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12710

Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Digby, R., Howe, A., Collier, C., & Hay, P. (2014). The roles and development needs of teachers to promote creativity: A systematic review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 34-41.

Kamaluddin, M. R., & Nasir, R. (2017). Kesahan kandungan dan muka. In M. R. Kamaluddin & W. S. Wan Sulaiman (Eds.), Teknik kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan alat uji psikologi (pp. 39–50). Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). CBS Publishing.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Marican, S. (2009). Penyelidikan sains sosial: Pendekatan pragmatik. Edusystem Sdn. Bhd.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2017a). National Preschool Standard-Based Curriculum (Revised 2017). Putrajaya: Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Mohd Matore, M. E. E., Idris, H., Abdul Rahman, N., & Khairani, A. Z. (2017). Kesahan kandungan pakar instrumen IKBAR bagi pengukuran AQ menggunakan nisbah kesahan kandungan. Proceeding of International Conference on Global Education V (ICGE V), 979–997.

Mokhlis, S. (2019). Pemupukan kreativiti kanak-kanak: Kajian kes amalan pengajaran kreativiti di sebuah tadika Islam [Nurturing creativity in young children: A case study of the practice of teaching for creativity in an Islamic kindergarten]. ATTARBAWIY: Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 3(1), 34–48. Retrieved from https://attarbawiy.kuis.edu.my/index.php/jurnal/article/view/65

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill Company

Polit, D. F., Beck, T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on research methods is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 30, 459–467. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur

Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x

Ramli, N. F., Talib, O., Abdul Manaf, U. K., & Hassan, S. A. (2018). Content validity of STEMTIP using CVR method. International Journal Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 1118–1125. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i7/4559

Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94

Samsudin, M. Z., Hassan, R., & Hasan, A. (2013). Amalan kreativiti guru dalam pengajaran pendidikan asas vokasional (PAV). PPI-UTM TESIC.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2011). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). Wiley.

Soh, K. (2015). Creativity fostering teacher behaviour around the world: Annotations of studies using the CFTIndex. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1034494. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2015.1034494

Wilson, H. S. (1989). Research in nursing (2nd ed.). California: Addison-Wesley Company. Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175612440286

Yaghmaie, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v3i1.870

Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A. R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017

Downloads

Published

2023-07-26

How to Cite

Mat Saberi, N. A., Mohd Radzi, N. M., & Loy , C. L. (2023). Assessing content validity of preschool teacher’s creative teaching instrument for children’s language arts: A Study based on CFTI (Creativity Fostering Teacher Index) using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 16, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol16.sp2.14.2023

Issue

Section

Articles