Layered approach in energy-efficient Information Technology (IT) classroom design

Authors

  • Okta Nurika Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Hafizul Fahri Hanafi Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Low Tang Jung Computer and Information Sciences Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Tronoh, Malaysia.
  • Ahmed Abba Haruna College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Hafr Al Batin, Al Jamiah, Saudi Arabia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol11.1.1.2024

Keywords:

Energy-efficient classroom, layered method, IT classroom

Abstract

Designing an energy-efficient IT classroom has not been straightforward due to the scattered recommended practices that involve different aspects. Some related aspects have not even been explored and need to be included - to increase the level of power saving and flexibility in implementation. Thus, a comprehensive layered approach or method is designed by this paper. It involves four (4) layers that represent different aspects of an IT classroom that can be made efficient in terms of energy consumption, namely hardware, platform, middleware, and application layers. Each layer is autonomous and hence can be implemented flexibly, subject to the bespoke feasibility of the use case. The proposed method is also expected to be future-proof and expandable due to its catering to both hardware and software-based optimizations. Such guidance is also crucial for the ongoing Industrial Revolution (IR) 4.0 and soon-to-be-established IR 5.0, where smart cities worldwide would be required to be energy-efficient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahamed, F. (2013). The Fdos operating system. Computer Society of India.

Almusalli, F., Zaman, N., & Rasool, R. (2017). Energy efficient middleware: Design and development for mobile applications. 19th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), 541-549. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT.2017.7890149.

Biswas, A., Fujimoto, R., & Hunter, M. (2018). Energy efficient middleware for dynamic data driven application systems. 2018 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 628-639. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2018.8632433.

Bresnahan, C. and Blum, R. (2020). LPI Linux essentials study guide. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119657712.ch1.

Diddeniya, S. A. I. P., Gunawardana, H. D. C. N., Maduwantha, K., Koswattage, K. R., Randima, M. V., & Vasanthapriyan, S. (2020). IoT based energy efficient smart classroom. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Studies, 6(12), 3581-3586.

Herzog, B., Hugel, F., Reif, S., Honig, T., & Schröder-Preikschat, W. (2021). Automated selection of energy-efficient operating system configurations. e-Energy '21: Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems, 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447555.3465327.

Khan, W. (2013). Energy efficient mobile operating systems. International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, 5(1), 1812-1817.

Mason, L., Manzione, L., Ronconi, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2022). Lessons in a green school environment and in the classroom: Effects on students’ cognitive functioning and affect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416823.

Mason, L., Ronconi, A., Scrimin, S., & Pazzaglia, F. (2022). Short-term exposure to nature and benefits for students’ cognitive performance: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09631-8.

Mason, L., Zagni, B., Bacchin, F., Frison, C., & Scrimin, S. (2022). Children’s attentional processes in outdoor and indoor environments: The role of physiological self-regulation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013141.

Mwiinga, P. (2023). Operating system. Real Deal.

Nath, P. B. & Uddin, M. M. (2015). TCP-IP model in data communication and networking. American Journal of Engineering Research, 4(10), 102-107.

Odun-Ayo, I., Okokpujie, K., Oputa, K., Ogbu, H., Emmanuel, F., Shofadekan, A., & Okuazun, G. (2020). Comparative study of operating system quality attributes. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1107/1/012061.

Patil, B. K., Badgujar, R. D., Nil, N. L., Suryawanshi, S. N., Patel, D. C., & Bagul, P. P. (2018). Energy efficient smart classroom. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 6(6), 85-89.

Rathee, P. (2019). Basic principles of an operating system. BPB Publications.

Santos, D. & Ferreira, J. C. (2019). IoT power monitoring system for smart environments. Sustainability, 11(19), 5355-5378. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195355.

Sasane, N. N., Sakat, S.N., Nemane, S. K., Pallav, P. K., & Kaushik, V. R. (2017). IoT based energy meter billing and monitoring system - A case study. International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science, 2(4), 64-68.

Simpson, W. (2002). Energy sustainability and the green campus. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 150-158.

Sinha, A. (2014). Energy efficient operating systems and software [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].

Sunil, J., Vincy, A. J., & Thirumalai, K. (2018). Fundamentals of operating systems concepts. Lambert Academic Publications.

Taemthong, W. and Plitsiri, I. (2023). Using active green wall systems for both saving energy and improving indoor air quality in classrooms. E3S Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337904002.

Tan, X. & Hakala, L. (2023). StateOS: A memory-efficient hybrid operating system for IoT devices. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(11), 9523-9533. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3234106.

Tiyarattanachai, R. & Hollmann, N. M. (2016). Green campus initiative and its impacts on quality of life of stakeholders in green and non-green campus universities. Springerplus, 5(1), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1697-4.

Vahdat. A., Lebeck, A., & Ellis, C. S. (2000). Every Joule is precious: The case for revisiting operating system design for energy efficiency. EW 9: Proceedings of the 9th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop: Beyond the PC: New challenges for the operating system. 31-36, https://doi.org/10.1145/566726.566735.

Vella-Brodrick, D. & Gilowska, K. (2022). Effects of nature (greenspace) on cognitive functioning in school children and adolescents: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09658-5.

Youssef, J. (2022). The influence of operating system on the energy consumption of software and algorithms [Bachelor thesis, University of Stuttgart]. OPUS - Publication Server of the University of Stuttgart. http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-12181.

Zangori, L. & Cole, L. (2019). Assessing the contributions of green building practices to ecological literacy in the elementary classroom: An exploratory study. Environmental Education Research, 25(11), 1674-1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1662372.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-13

How to Cite

Nurika, O., Hanafi, H. F., Tang Jung, L., & Abba Haruna, A. (2024). Layered approach in energy-efficient Information Technology (IT) classroom design. Journal of ICT in Education, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol11.1.1.2024