Penilaian keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif segerak dan tidak segerak secara atas talian bagi kursus Pengurusan Geoinformasi

Effectiveness assessment on synchronous and asynchronous online active learning for Geoinformation Management course

Authors

  • Zakri Tarmidi UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Uznir Ujang UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Akhmal Sidek UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Ahmad Nabil Md Nasir UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.2.2.2022

Keywords:

synchronous learning, asynchronous learning, active learning, online active learning, geoinformation management

Abstract

Pembelajaran aktif telah terbukti berkesan dapat meningkatkan kefahaman dan pencapaian pelajar, dengan menumpukan kepada perbincangan antara pelajar, dan komunikasi dua hala dalam memahami topik dalam kursus yang diambil. Pembelajaran aktif kebiasaannya dilaksanakan secara bersemuka, namun ketika berlakunya pandemik COVID-19, proses ini tidak dapat dilaksanakan kerana pembelajaran perlu dibuat secara atas talian sepenuhnya. Walaupun begitu, terdapat program-program pengajian yang menjalankan pembelajaran aktif secara atas talian. Akan tetapi kurang kajian yang khusus dijalankan bagi melihat keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif secara atas talian sepenuhnya. Oleh yang demikian, penyelidikan di dalam kertas penyelidikan ini dilaksanakan bertujuan untuk melihat keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif secara atas talian dengan menggunakan teknik segerak dan tidak segerak. Kursus Pengurusan Data Spatial Lanjutan dipilih sebagai sampel kajian kerana ianya merupakan salah satu kursus di dalam kategori pengurusan Geoinformasi. Kaedah kajian yang digunakan adalah kajian tinjauan dan penandaarasan bagi melihat maklumbalas pelajar dan perbandingan pencapaian pelajar dengan pelaksanaan pembelajaran aktif secara atas talian secara segerak dan tidak segerak. Hasil analisis menunjukkan, bagi kajian tinjauan, maklumbalas pelajar berada pada tahap tinggi, dengan nilai skor min 4.17, manakala bagi kajian penandaarasan, perbezaan peratus tahap pencapaian pelajar adalah menurun sedikit, dengan nilai min 4.3 namun tidak memberi impak yang besar terhadap pencapaian pelajar. Hasil kajian ini menunjukkan kaedah pembelajaran aktif boleh dilaksanakan secara atas talian, dengan menggabungkan teknik pembelajaran segerak dan tidak segerak.

 

Abstract

Active learning has been shown to be effective in improving student comprehension and achievement, by focusing on a discussion between students, and two-way communication in understanding the topics in the course taken. Active learning is usually done face-to-face, however in the event of a Covid-19 pandemic, this process is not feasible because learning has to be done entirely online. Even though several teaching programs implement online active learning, the previous studies less emphasis on assessing the effectiveness of active learning implementation in fully online practices. This study aimed to look at the effectiveness of online active learning using synchronous and asynchronous techniques, for the Advanced Spatial Data Management course. The research method used is survey research and benchmarking to identify student feedback and comparison of student achievement with the implementation of active learning online synchronously and asynchronously. The results of the analysis showed that for the survey study, student feedback was at a high level, with a mean score of 4.17, while for the benchmarking study, the difference in the percentage of student achievement was slightly decreased, with a mean value of 4.3 but did not have a significant impact on student achievement. The results of this study indicate that active learning methods can be implemented online, by combining synchronous and asynchronous learning techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BERNAMA. (2021, January 21). PdPR: Masalah peralatan, internet, isu keberkesanan antara keluhan. https://www.utusanborneo.com.my/2021/01/23/pdpr-masalah-peralatan-internet-isu-keberkesanan-antara-keluhan

Brady, A. K., & Pradhan, D. (2020). Learning without borders: Asynchronous and Distance Learning in the Age of COVID-19 and Beyond. ATS Scholar, 1(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0046PS

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z

Fahmi, M. H. (2020). Komunikasi Synchronous dan Asynchronous dalam e-Learning Pada Masa Pandemik Covid-19. Jurnal Nomosleca, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.26905/nomosleca.v6i2.4947

Hamzah, M. (2007). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Perbincangan Atas Talian dalam Portal My Guru 2 Terhadap Pembelajaran di UPSI. 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention.

Henriksen, D., Creely, E., & Henderson, M. (2020). Folk pedagogies for teacher transitions: Approaches to synchronous online learning in the wake of COVID-19. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 201–209.

In, F. C., & Ahmad, A. Z. (2019). Kajian Keberkesanan Pembelajaran Interaktif Berasaskan Aplikasi Kahoot. Online Journal For TVET Practitioners, 4(1).

Ishak, N. S., & Khalid, F. B. (2021). Penggunaan video YouTube bagi Meningkatkan Minat dan Pencapaian murid dalam Pembelajaran Geografi Fizikal di Sekolah Menengah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(3), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i3.708

Johari, N. A., & Harun, J. (2010). Pembangunan Dan Penilaian Keberkesanan Persekitaran Pembelajaran Sosial Menerusi Web Bagi Menggalakkan Pembelajaran Aktif. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Karupaiah, T., & Sarojini, E. D. G. (2021). Inter-School Synchronous Peer Collaboration in Enhancing the Science Process Skills of Controlling Variables and Formulating Hypothesis Among Low Achieving Year Five Pupils. Journal of ICT in Education, 8(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol8.1.6.2021

Kaviza, M. (2020). Kesediaan murid terhadap penggunaan aplikasi Google Classroom sebagai platform pembelajaran sejarah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(4), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i4.397

Koppelman, H. (2009). Active learning in asynchronous distance education. IADIS International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age 2009, 392–395.

Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169–179.

McCarthy, J. P., & Anderson, L. (2000). Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: Two experiments from history and political science. Innovative Higher Education, 24(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047415.48495.05

Ministry of Education, M. (2020). Pemakluman Pelaksanaan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Rumah (PDPR). https://www.moe.gov.my/en/pemberitahuan/announcement/pemakluman-pdpr

Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S27.

Öztürk, M. (2021). Asynchronous online learning experiences of students in pandemic process: Facilities, challenges, suggestions. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.767378

Papazoglou, N. (n.d.). Advantages and Disadvantages of Active Learning in Mega Classes: A Case of Self-Administered Clas.

Phillips, J. M. (2005). Strategies for active learning in online continuing education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 36(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-20050301-08

Razak, R. A. (2017). Strategi pembelajaran aktif secara kolaboratif atas talian dalam analisis novel Bahasa Melayu. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(3), 34–46.

Sabua, N., Nazrib, N. H., & Md Amin, M. A. (2019). Meningkatkan pelaksanaan aktiviti non face to face dalam kalangan pelajar biologi DB 024 melalui penggunaan gelung penilaian formatif digital. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 20, 113–123.

Spiceland, D., & Hawkins, C. (2002). The impact on learning of an asynchronous active learning course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 68–75.

UTM, F. (2021). Bachelor of Science (Geoinformatics). https://builtsurvey.utm.my/academic/bachelor-of-science-geoinformatics/

Verma, S., Panigrahi, T. R., & Alok, D. (2021). COVID 19 and online learning in post graduate management programme: An empirical analysis of students’ perception. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 23(2), 108–123.

Wolff, M., Wagner, M. J., Poznanski, S., Schiller, J., & Santen, S. (2015). Not another boring lecture: Engaging learners with active learning techniques. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 48(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.09.010

Zahit, R., & Noni, N. S. (2020). Keberkesanan perbincangan atas talian dalam penyediaan rancangan perniagaan di kalangan pelajar kejuruteraan. ANP Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.53797/anpjssh.v1i1.5.2020

Downloads

Published

2022-11-22

How to Cite

Tarmidi, Z., Ujang, U., Sidek, A., & Md Nasir, A. N. (2022). Penilaian keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif segerak dan tidak segerak secara atas talian bagi kursus Pengurusan Geoinformasi: Effectiveness assessment on synchronous and asynchronous online active learning for Geoinformation Management course. Journal of ICT in Education, 9(2), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.2.2.2022