Production of Kombucha SCOBY Cellulose by Using Tea and Pumpkin Peel Waste as Fermentation Substrates: A Comparison Study

Authors

  • Rusyidah Mat Zin Boestami Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Azlan Kamari Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Eli Rohaeti Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
  • Budi Hastuti Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Kentingan Surakarta 57126, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol12.2.9.2024

Keywords:

Kombucha, SCOBY, Cellulose, Biopolymer, Tea, Pumpkin Peel

Abstract

A market research survey by Technavio has estimated that the global market size of kombucha is projected to grow by USD 3.56 billion from 2021 to 2026 with a Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) value of 19.36%. Kombucha can generate new pellicle Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeast (SCOBY) that produces biopolymer of cellulose. The production of cellulose from fermentation of kombucha SCOBY has received great attention from scientists. The main objective of this preliminary study was to produce kombucha SCOBY cellulose (KSC) from tea and pumpkin peel waste as fermentation substrates. The carbohydrate and protein contents of both tea and pumpkin peel waste were determined by proximate analysis. The physicochemical properties of kombucha SCOBY cellulose (KSC) were studied using two spectroscopic techniques, namely Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). FTIR spectra revealed the existence of functional groups in KSC. Meanwhile, XRD spectra presented the crystallinity by diffraction peak and crystal lattice of KSC. Overall, results from FTIR and XRD analyses suggest that both kombucha SCOBY cellulose obtained from tea and pumpkin peel fermentation substrates possess similar physicochemical properties to that of commercial cellulose. In conclusion, the application of tea and pumpkin peel waste as fermentation substrates in production of kombucha SCOBY cellulose is feasible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rusyidah Mat Zin Boestami, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

Department of Chemical and Food Technology, Politeknik Tun Syed Nasir Syed Ismail, Hab Pendidikan Tinggi Pagoh, KM 1, Jalan Panchor, 84600 Muar, Johor, Malaysia

References

Aditiawati P, Taufik I, Alexis JJ, Dungani R. (2023). Bacterial nanocellulose from symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast Kombucha prepared with lemongrass tea and sucrose: Optimization and characterization. BioResources, 18(2), 3178-3197.

Ahmed RF, Hikal MS, Abou-Taleb KA. (2020). Biological, chemical and antioxidant activities of different types Kombucha. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 65(1), 35-41.

Avcioglu NH, Birben M, Seyis BI. (2021). Optimization and physicochemical characterization of enhanced microbial cellulose production with a new Kombucha Consortium. Process Biochemistry, 108, 60-68.

Aziz A, Noreen S, Khalid, W, Ejaz A, Faizul RI, Maham, Munir A, Farwa, Javed M, Ercisli S, Okcu Z, Marc RA, Nayik GA, Ramniwas S, Uddin J. (2023). Pumpkin and pumpkin byproducts: Phytochemical constitutes, food application and health benefits. ACS Omega, 8(26), 23346-23357.

Baker L. (2018). Beginner’s Guide to Correlation Analysis: Learn the one reason your correlation results are probably wrong. CSI Publishing.

Balentine DA, Wiseman SA, Bouwens LC. (1997). The chemistry of Tea Flavonoids. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 37(8), 693-704.

Bauer-Petrovska B, Petrushevska-Tozi L. (2000). Mineral and water-soluble vitamin content in the Kombucha drink. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 35(2), 201-205.

Biocyclopedia.com. (2024). Phenol suplhuric acid method for total carbohydrate - Carbohydrates, Laboratory Methodology.https://biocyclopedia.com/index/plant_protocols/carbohydrates/phenol_suplhuric_acid_method_for_total_carbohydrate.php [Access 12 December 2023]

Brian H. (2008). Utilisation of squash waste. Bachelor of Technology (Honours) in Food Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Bryszewska MA, Tabandeh E, Jędrasik J, Czarnecka M, Dzierżanowska J, Ludwicka K. (2023). SCOBY cellulose modified with apple powder-biomaterial with functional characteristics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(2), 1005.

Chakravorty S, Bhattacharya S, Chatzinotas A, Chakraborty W, Bhattacharya D, Gachhui R. (2016). Kombucha tea fermentation: Microbial and biochemical dynamics. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 220, 63-72.

Chang WS, Chen HH. (2016). Physical properties of bacterial cellulose composites for wound dressings. Food Hydrocolloids, 53, 75-83.

Chonoko U, Rufai A. (2011). Phytochemical screening and antibacterial activity of cucurbita pepo (pumpkin) against staphylococcus aureus and salmonella typhi. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 4(1), 145-147.

Costa A, Almeida F, Vinhas G, Sarubbo L. (2017). Production of bacterial cellulose by using corn steep liquor as nutrient sources. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 2027.

Coton M, Pawtowski A, Taminiau B, Burgaud G, Deniel F, Coulloumme-Labarthe L, Coton E. (2017). Unraveling microbial ecology of industrial-scale Kombucha fermentations by metabarcoding and culture-based methods. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 93(5), 1-16.

Cuco RP, Cardozo-Filho L, da Silva C. (2019). Simultaneous extraction of seed oil and active compounds from peel of pumpkin (cucurbita maxima) using pressurized carbon dioxide as solvent. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 143, 8-15.

Department of Agriculture (DOA) Malaysia. Booklet Statistik Tanaman 2023. [Access 11 Novenber 2023].

Expert Market Research. (2020). Global kombucha tea market to grow at a CAGR of 20% between 2021-2026. EMR - expert market research. https://www.expertmarketresearch.com/reports/kombucha-tea-market [Access 12 October 2023].

Engel T, Hehre WJ, Angerhofer A. (2019). Quantum Chemistry and spectroscopy. Pearson.

Gaggìa F, Baffoni L, Galiano M, Nielsen DS, Jakobsen RR, Castro-Mejía JL, Bosi S, Truzzi F, Musumeci F, Dinelli G, Gioia DD. (2019). Kombucha beverage from green, black and rooibos teas: A comparative study looking at microbiology, chemistry and antioxidant activity. Nutrients, 11(1), 1.

Gargey IA, Indira D, Jayabalan R, Balasubramanian P. (2019). Optimization of etherification reactions for recycling of tea fungal biomass waste into carboxymethylcellulose. In: Green Buildings and Sustainable Engineering. Springer, Singapore, 337-346.

Goh W, Rosma A, Kaur B, Fazilah A, Karim A, Bhat R. (2012). Fermentation of black tea broth (Kombucha): I. Effects of sucrose concentration and fermentation time on the yield of microbial cellulose. International Food Research Journal, 19(1), 109-117.

Grand View Research. (2016). Cellulose fiber market size, share & trends analysis by product type (natural, synthetic), by application (textile, hygiene, industrial), by regions and segment forecasts, 2018-2025. San Francisco, USA.

Gullo M, Sola A, Zanichelli G, Montorsi M, Messori M, Giudici P. (2017). Increased production of bacterial cellulose as starting point for scaled-up applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(22), 8115-8127.

Hopfe S, Flemming K, Lehmann F, Möckel R, Kutschke S, Pollmann K. (2017). Leaching of rare earth elements from fluorescent powder using the tea fungus Kombucha. Waste Management, 62, 211-221.

Huang Y, Zhu C, Yang J, Nie Y, Chen C, Sun D. (2013). Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose, 21(1), 1-30.

Kim J, Adhikari K. (2020). Current trends in Kombucha: Marketing perspectives and the need for improved sensory research. Beverages, 6(1), 1-19.

KBI. (2022). Kombucha Brewers International, 2022. https://www.facebook.com/kombuchabrewersinternational/ [Access 20 November 2023].

Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A. (2011). Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature‐based materials. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 50(24), 5438-5466.

Kumar V, Joshi V. (2016). Kombucha: Technology, Microbiology, Production, Composition and Therapeutic Value. International Journal of Food and Fermentation Technology, 6(1), 13-24.

Laavanya D, Shirkole S, Balasubramanian P. (2021). Current challenges, applications and future perspectives of Scoby cellulose of Kombucha fermentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126454.

Leonarski E, Cesca K, Borges OMA, de Oliveira D, Poletto P. (2021). Typical kombucha fermentation: Kinetic evaluation of beverage and morphological characterization of bacterial cellulose. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 45(12), e16100.

May A, Narayanan S, Alcock J, Varsani A, Maley C, Aktipis A. (2019). Kombucha: A novel model system for cooperation and conflict in a complex multi-species microbial ecosystem. PeerJ, 7, 7565

Naomi R, Idrus R, Fauzi MB. (2020). Plant vs bacterial-derived cellulose for wound healing: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6803.

Neera KVR, Harsh BV. (2015). Occurrence of cellulose-producing gluconacetobacter spp. in fruit samples and kombucha tea, and production of the biopolymer. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 176(4), 1162-1173.

Nguyen HT, Saha N, Ngwabebhoh FA, Zandraa O, Saha T, Saha P. (2021). Kombucha-derived bacterial cellulose from diverse wastes: A prudent leather alternative. Cellulose, 28(14), 9335-9353.

Ojo AO, de Smidt O. (2023). Microbial composition, bioactive compounds, potential benefits and risks associated with Kombucha: A concise review. Fermentation, 9(5), 472.

Oudiani AE, Chaabouni Y, Msahli S, Sakli F. (2011). Crystal transition from cellulose I to cellulose II in NaOH treated Agave americana L. fibre. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86(3), 1221-1229.

Peelman N, Ragaert P, De Meulenaer B, Adons D, Peeters R, Cardon L, Van Impe F., Devlieghere F. (2013). Application of bioplastics for Food Packaging. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 32(2), 128-141.

Ratnasari D, Nazir F, Toresano LO, Pawiro SA, Soejoko, DS. (2016). The correlation between effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with renal scintigraphy99mTc-DTPA study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 694, 012062.

Rusdi RA, Halim NA, Norizan MN, Abidin ZH, Abdullah N, Che Ros F, Ahmad N, Azmi AF. (2022). Pre-treatment effect on the structure of bacterial cellulose from Nata de Coco (acetobacter xylinum). Polimery, 67(3), 110-118.

Sari SR, Shinchi E, Shida K, Kusumawati Y, Madurani KA, Kurniawan F, Tominaga M. (2023). A green cellulose nanofiber-based printed electrode for practical highly sensitive amoxicillin detection. The Analyst, 148(13), 2932-2940.

Mala KS, Kurian AE. (2016). Nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of pumpkin wastes. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 6(3), 336-344.

Sezali NAA, Ong HL, Jullok N, Villagracia AR, Doong R. (2021). A review on nanocellulose and its application in supercapacitors. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 306(12), 2100556.

Shaghaleh H, Xu X, Wang S. (2018). Current progress in production of biopolymeric materials based on cellulose, cellulose nanofibers, and cellulose derivatives. RSC Advances, 8(2), 825-842.

Song JE, Kim HR. (2019). Bacterial cellulose as promising biomaterial and its application. Advances in Textile Biotechnology, 263-277.

The STAR. (2022). https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2022/08/12/swcorp-reports-3-drop-in-amount-of-rubbish-collected. [Access 19 November 2023].

De Salvi DTB, da S. Barud H, Treu-Filho O, Pawlicka A, Mattos RI, Raphael E, Ribeiro SJL. (2014). Preparation, thermal characterization and DFT study of the bacterial cellulose. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 118(1), 205-215.

Tyagi N, Suresh S. (2016). Production of cellulose from sugarcane molasses using Gluconacetobacter intermedius SNT-1: Optimization & Characterization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 71-80.

Ul-Islam M, Khattak W, Kang A, Kim M, Khan S, Park M. (2013). Effect of post-synthetic processing conditions on structural variations and applications of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose, 20(1), 253-263.

Ul-Islam M, Ullah MW, Khan S, Park JK. (2020). Production of bacterial cellulose from alternative cheap and waste resources: A step for cost reduction with positive environmental aspects. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 37(6), 925-937.

Wu Z-Y, Liang H-W, Chen L-F, Hu B-C, Yu S-H. (2015). Bacterial cellulose: A robust platform for design of three dimensional carbon-based functional nanomaterials. Accounts of Chemical Research, 49(1), 96-105.

Yim SM, Song JE, Kim HR. (2017). Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose fabrics by nitrogen sources of tea and carbon sources of sugar. Process Biochemistry, 59, 26-36.

Yok MC, Gisong SA, Modon BA, Rusim R. (2016). Creating new market in integrated agriculture development area in Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia - case study in the supply chain of Cucurbita sp. (pumpkin). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 516-522.

Zeng M, Laromaine A, Roig A. (2014). Bacterial cellulose films: influence of bacterial strain and drying route on film properties. Cellulose, 21(6), 4455-4469.

Zeng X, Sun J, Yao Y, Sun R, Xu J-B, Wong C-P. (2017). A combination of boron nitride nanotubes and cellulose nanofibers for the preparation of a nanocomposite with high thermal conductivity. ACS Nano, 11(5), 5167-5178.

Zhu C, Li F, Zhou X, Lin L, Zhang T. (2014). Kombucha-synthesized bacterial cellulose: preparation, characterization, and biocompatibility evaluation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 102(5), 1548-1557.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

Mat Zin Boestami, R., Kamari, A., Eli Rohaeti, & Budi Hastuti. (2024). Production of Kombucha SCOBY Cellulose by Using Tea and Pumpkin Peel Waste as Fermentation Substrates: A Comparison Study. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 12(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol12.2.9.2024