The Level of Knowledge and Perception of Secondary School Students on i-Think Mind Map in the District of Merlimau, Malacca
Tahap Pengetahuan dan Persepsi Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Terhadap Peta Minda i-Think di Daerah Merlimau, Melaka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol10.sp.8.2022Keywords:
i-Think mind map knowledge, i-Think mind map perception, thinking toolsAbstract
This study was carried out to identify the level of students’ knowledge and to compare gender perception on the i-Think mind map in Merlimau district, Malacca. A survey design was employed using a five-point Likert Scale structured questionnaire. Respondents were selected using simple random sampling involving 343 forms one to form four students. Descriptive analysis was conducted to find the mean and percentage, while inferential analysis using a two-way ANOVA, t-test to make a comparison between knowledge and perception of the i-Think mind map. This study demonstrated the form four students had the highest knowledge level of 83.72 per cent (excellent) followed by form two and form one with a value of 82.46 per cent (excellent) and 79.49 per cent (good) respectively. The perceptions level among the respondents towards the i-Think mind map was moderately high and uniform (mean value of 3.01 – 4.00). Female students’ knowledge was higher (mean value of 3.66) than male (mean value of 3.54). The study also found that there was a significant difference between the level of knowledge and perception of male and female students with significant values of 0.007 and 0.001 respectively. This study concludes that the i-Think mind map is well received by students. Hence, these findings have the potential to be benchmarked on the status of i-Think mind map implementation in Malaysia, particularly in Malacca. Continuous monitoring should be carried out to view its consistency among students. This study implicates that the i-Think mind map should be used to enhance the students' content knowledge on a larger scale.
Downloads
References
Abi-El-Mona, I., & Adbkhalick, F. (2008). The influence of mind mapping on eight graders’ science achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 108(7), 298-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17843.x
Akinoglu, O., & Yasar, Z. (2007). The effects of note-taking in science education through the mind mapping technique on students’ attitudes, academic achievement and concept learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(3), 34-43.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Education Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th edition). USA: Pearson Education Inc.
Dembo, M. H. & Seli, H. (2016) (5th Ed.) Motivation and learning strategies for college success: A focus on self-regulated learning. New York: Routledge.
Gul, S., Asif, M., Ahmad, W. and Ahmad, U. (2017). Teaching programming: A mind map-based methodology to improve learning outcomes, International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICICT), 2017, pp. 209-213, DOI: 10.1109/ICICT.2017.8320192.
Hanita Mohd Yusof & Norzaini Azman. (2020). Perbezaan gender dalam pencapaian murid: kaitannya dengan keterlibatan murid dan sokongan pembelajaran. Jurnal Psikologi Asia Selatan.10: 90-110.
Huang, J. X., & Iksan, Z. (2019). Kefahaman Guru Sekolah Rendah Daerah Pekan terhadap Pembelajaran Abad ke-21 (PAK21). International Journal of Modern Education, 1(2): 01-12.
Hyerle, D. & Alper, L. (2011). Student Success with Thinking Maps® Second Edition (2nd. Edition). United States of America: Corwin A SAGE Company.
Hyerle, D. (2009). Visual tools for transforming information into knowledge. Thousand -*Oaks: Corwin Press.
Hyerle, D. & Yeager, C. (2007). Thinking Map: A Language for Learning. Cary NC: Thinking Maps. Inc.
Isil Tanriseven. (2014). A Tool That Can Be Effective in the Self-regulated Learning of Regulated Learning of Preservice Teachers: The Mind Map. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1) Article 5: 65-80.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Khairudin Nawawi & Norazilawati Abdullah. (2016). Keberkesanan Peta Pemikiran Terhadap Peningkatan Prestasi Bahasa Arab dalam Kalangan Pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 9 (2): 66-76.
Mohd Mahzan Awang, Abdul Razaq Ahmad & Mohd Muhaimi Abdul Rahman. (2014). Penggunaan Peta Minda oleh Pelajar Pintar Cerdas dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 39(2): 95-100
Nik Rosnizasuzila Nik Hassan, Azlina Mohd. Kosnin & Zakiah Mohamad Ashari. (2015). Keperluan modul I-Think dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran di sekolah. In 2nd International Education Postgraduate Seminar, 20-21 Dis, 2015, Johor Bahru, Johor.
Normah Zakaria, Azita Ali, Nur Izeanty Hamidon & Suhaili Abd Rasap. (2018). Aplikasi peta pemikiran I-Think dalam meningkatkan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT). Journal for TVET Practitioner, Special Issue: Multidisciplinary Research in Education, 3:19-26.
Noor Hashimah and Amir Shaukhi. (2013). Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dalam Menjayakan Penyediaan Pendidikan Abad Ke-21. Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan Ke-20: 1-13. Institut Aminuddin Baki.
Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd. Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 701.
Nur Fatin Afiqah Kamaruzaman & Zolkepeli Haron. (2018). Peta pemikiran I-Think terhadap skor pencapaian dan minat pelajar kolej vokasional dalam mata pelajaran sains. International Conference on Global Education VI. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Redesigning Education, 1:689-711.
Nursyuhadah Maskan. (2013). Pelaksanaan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah (PBS) bagi Mata Pelajaran Sains di Sekolah Kebangsaan Daerah Pontian, Johor. Master’s Thesis. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn, Malaysia.
Rohaida Yusop & Zamri Mahamod. (2015). Keberkesanan peta pemikiran (i-Think) dalam meningkatkan pencapaian penulisan Bahasa Melayu murid tahun 6. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu; Malay Language Education (MyLEJ), 5(2): 31-37.
Romlie, M. F., Bakar, Z. A. and Azman, N. A. (2017). An Innovative Approach of Using Mind Map to Support Active Learning for Engineering Students, 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF), 2017, pp. 294-297, DOI: 10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467135.
Roselizam Daud & Roslan Ab. Rahman. (2020). Persepsi guru terhadap penggunaan peta pemikiran i-Think dalam pengajaran Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal BITARA Kajian Tamadun dan Sains Kemanusiaan, 3(2): 124-140.
Rosnidar Mansor, Haeidatul Nashrah, Norazilawati Abdullah & Nik Azmah Nik Yusuf. (2015). Keberkesanan penggunaan I-Think terhadap pencapaian dan minat murid dalam tajuk sifat bahan, Sains Tahun 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 5(2): 85-97.
Shamsazila Sa'aban, Muhammad Faizal Abdul Ghani & Ghazali Darusalam, (2017), Pendedahan Program i-Think di Peringkat Sekolah Mengikut Pendekatan Sekolah Secara Menyeluruh: Satu Kajian Awal. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 4(2): 2-20.
Siti Zubaidah, Nur Miftahul Fuad, Susriyati Mahanal, Endang Suarsini (2017). Improving Creative Thinking Skills Of Students Through Differentiated Science Inquiry Integrated With Mind Map. Journal Of Turkish Science Education, 14(4): 77-91.DOI: 10.12973/tused.10214a).
Stainburn, S. (2011). How can we reform science education? Accessed on October 8, 2013, from https://hechingerreport.org/how-can-we-reform-science-education/
Sukiman Saad, Noor Shah Saad & Mohd Uzi Dollah. (2012). Pengajaran kemahiran berfikir: persepsi dan amalan guru Matematik semasa pengajaran dan pembelajaran di bilik darjah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 2(1): 18-36.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) (2020). Putrajaya: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
