Penilaian Kualiti Modul FZ-STEM: Aspek Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan
Assessing the Quality of FZ-STEM Module: Validity and Reliability Aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.sp.10.2021Keywords:
kesahan, kebolehpercayaan, modul, FZ-STEMAbstract
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menilai kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan Modul FZ-STEM yang telah dibangunkan mengikut Model Pembinaan Modul Sidek. Kesahan kandungan Modul FZ-STEM telah dinilai oleh sepuluh orang pakar bidang berkaitan pengajaran dan pembelajaran (pdp) dan pendidikan STEM. Bagi menguji kebolehpercayaan Modul FZ-STEM, kajian rintis dijalankan terhadap 40 orang murid di sebuah sekolah menengah. Murid mengikuti kesemua aktiviti yang dicadangkan dalam Modul FZ-STEM dan menjawab soal selidik kebolehpercayaan modul. Secara keseluruhannya, Modul FZ-STEM memperoleh kesahan kandungan yang baik serta kebolehpercayaan sangat baik masing-masing dengan nilai min keseluruhan kandungan 0.95 dan nilai alfa Cronbach 0.867. Pengkaji telah mengambil kira kesemua cadangan serta komen pakar dan melakukan penambah baikan supaya dapat digunakan sebagai modul pdp STEM yang berkesan. Modul ini menjadi modul tambahan kepada modul integrasi STEM yang sedia ada dan menjadi rujukan kepada guru dan murid untuk menjalankan pdp berasaskan pendekatan STEM. Justeru, kajian ini diharapkan dapat memberi gambaran pelaksanaan pdp STEM berdasarkan pendekatan pembelajaran berasaskan projek (PBP) yang boleh memberi kesan terhadap pembinaan Kemahiran Abad ke-21 (KA-21) dan pencapaian Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) murid.
This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of the FZ-STEM Module that has been developed according to the Sidek’s Module Development Model. The content validity of the FZ-STEM Module was assessed by ten experts in the field related to teaching and learning (T&L) and STEM education. To test the reliability of the FZ-STEM Module, a pilot study was conducted on 40 students in a secondary school. Student attended all the activities suggested in the FZ-STEM Module. Then, student’s feedback were assessed by answering a module’s reliability questionnaire. Overall, the FZ-STEM Module obtained good content validity as well as excellent reliability respectively with an overall mean value is 0.99 and Cronbach’s alpha value is 0.867. The researcher has taken into account all the suggestions and comments from the experts and made improvements so that it can be utilised as an effective STEM teaching module. This module is hope to be an additional module to the existing STEM integration module and serves as a reference for teachers and students to conduct T&L based on the STEM approach. Plus, this study is expected to provide an overview of the implementation of STEM T&L based on Project Based Learning (PjBL) approach that can affect the enhancing of 21st Century Skills and student’ Higher Order Thinking (HOTs) achievement.
Keywords: validity; reliability; module; FZ-STEM
Downloads
References
Aliff Nawi, Gamal Abdul Nasir Zakaria, Norkhairiah Hashim, & Chua, C. R. (2015). Penilaian kualiti modul Ipbl: aspek kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 11(2), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.ukm.my/jqma/v11_2/jqma-11-2-paper1.pdf%0A
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). KBAT Inisiatif Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi di Sekolah. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Panduan pelaksanaan sains, teknologi, kejuruteraan dan matematik (STEM) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Fizik Tingkatan 4 dan 5. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning; An integrated Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd editio). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publisher.
Chia, S. C., Koay, K. C., Ooi, H. B., Mohd Khairul Anuar Md Mustafa, & Rema Ragavan. (2019). Fizik tingkatan 4. Johor Bahru: Pustaka Sarjana Sdn Bhd.
Chin, H. L., Siraj, S., Ahra Naimie, Nabeel Abedalaziz, Dorothy Dewitt, & Ghazali Darusalam. (2013). Delphi technique. In Saedah Siraj, Norlidah Alias, Dorothy DeWitt, & Zaharah Hussin (Eds.), Design and developmental research: Emergent trends in educational (pp. 71–84). Kuala Lumpur: Pearson.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. In Professional Development in Education (Vol. 38). https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130
Daly, J. C., & Cohen, J. (1978). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Revised Edition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(363), 680. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286629
Erdogan, N., & Bozeman, T. D. (2015). Models of Project-Based Learning for the 21st century. In A. Sahin (Ed.), A Practice-based Model of STEM Teaching STEM Students on the Stage (SOS) (pp. 31–42). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Ringkasan eksekutif pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (pendidikan prasekolah hingga lepasan menengah). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CAC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01231A
Mispuah Hassan, & Kamisah Hassan. (2016). Pembelajaran biologi berasaskan projek. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Lilia Halim, Zanaton Ikhsan, Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahili, & Raifana Rosa. (2015). Impact Studies of Integrated STEM Program. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications, 35(35), 1–5.
Mohd Ali Samsudin, Seyedh Mahboobeh Jamali, Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain, & Nader Ale Ebrahim. (2020). The effect of STEM project based learning on self-efficacy among high-school physics students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.15
Norlizawaty Baharin, Nurzatulshima Kamarudin, & Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf. (2018). Integrating STEM education approach in enhancing higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 810–821. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i7/4421
Nur Maizatul Azra Mukhtar, Faizal Hashim, Marina Mokhtar, Nor Aimi Abdul Wahab, Noorezal Atfyinna Mohd Napiah, & Suhaiza Hasan. (2017). Faktor yang mempengaruhi pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Fizik: Satu Sudut pandangan. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 195–201.
Parno, Yuliati, L., & Ni’mah, B. Q. A. (2019). The influence of PBL-STEM on students’ problem-solving skills in the topic of optical instruments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171, 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012013
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur
Purwaning Budi Lestari, Titik Wijayanti, & Tri Asih Wahyu Hartati. (2020). HOTS integrating STEM learning approach in the nutritional sciences learning at the higher education level. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 10(8), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.10.08.2020.p10406
Ramlan Mustapa, & Ghazali Darusalam. (2018). Aplikasi kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam penyelidikan sains sosial. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ruhizan Mohammad Yasin, Latifah Amin, & Kok Kean Hin. (2018). Pembangunan modul interdisiplin BTEM dengan model reka bentuk instruksional Morrison, Ross, Kalman & Kemp. In Muhammad Fariduddin Wajdi Anthony, Zahiroh Awang, & Saerah Shuib (Eds.), International Postgraduate Conference On Research In Education (IPCORE 2018) (pp. 52–83). Unit Penyelidikan Pendidikan Asas (UPPA) Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Pendidikan Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Rusell, J. D. (1974). Modular instruction: A guide to the design, selection, utilization and evaluation of modular. New York: Publishing Company.
Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Sofi Hanif, Agus Fany Chandra Wijaya, & Nanang Winarno. (2019). Enhancing students’ creativity through STEM project-based learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271
Tseng, K., Chang, C., Lou, S., & Chen, W. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
Uhame Harun. (2020). Project-based learning integrated to STEM (STEM-PJBL) to enhance arabic learning HOTS-based. AL-BIDAYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 12(1), 139–150. Retrieved from https://jurnal.albidayah.id/index.php/home/article/view/230%0A
Wan Nor Fadzilah Wan Husin, Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad, Oziah Othman, Lilia Halim, Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Kamisah Osman, & Zanaton Iksan. (2016). Fostering students’ 21st century skills through project oriented problem based learning (POPBL) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 1–19. Retrieved from https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v17_issue1_files/fadzilah.pdf
