Analisis pola penggunaan portal e-pembelajaran dan pencapaian subjek
Analysis of e-learning portal usage pattern and subject achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.1.9.2022Keywords:
objek pembelajaran, pola kekerapan capaian, pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam talian, aktiviti segerak, aktiviti tidak segerakAbstract
Pelaksanaan Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan (PKP) akibat Pandemik Covid-19 menyebabkan sebahagian sebahagian besar rutin harian normal berubah termasuk proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran di institusi pendidikan. Alternatif terbaik meneruskan proses pembelajaran tanpa bersemuka ialah memanfaatkan teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi (ICT) iaitu melaksanakan proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam talian (PdPDT) sepenuhnya yang memerlukan empat komponen utama; pensyarah, pelajar, pedagogi dan objek pembelajaran (learning object, LO), dan teknologi. Pelajar perlu mencapai objek pembelajaran yang disediakan oleh pensyarah dengan bantuan teknologi. Situasi ini secara tidak langsung memerlukan komitmen dan daya usaha pelajar menguruskan pembelajaran sendiri. Sehubungan itu, kajian ini bertujuan mengena pasti pola kekerapan capaian pelajar kepada LO bagi salah satu subjek umum universiti dalam tempoh PKP serta perkaitannya dengan pencapaian subjek. Kajian berbentuk kuantitatif ini menggunakan instrumen data log capaian portal e-pembelajaran bagi analisis deskriptif untuk mengenal pasti pola kekerapan capaian dan perkaitan pencapaian. Hasil analisis mendapati pelajar gred A mempunyai pola kekerapan capaian LO lebih tinggi berbanding pelajar gred B dan C. Manakala LO berbentuk dokumen lebih kerap dicapai berbanding LO video. Analisis perkaitan mendapati pola kekerapan capaian LO mempunyai kaitan dengan pencapaian pelajar. Perbincangan akhir kajian mencadangkan pensyarah perlu melaksanakan pengajaran dengan struktur tertentu yang memerlukan pelajar membuat capaian LO bagi membantu pencapaian subjek.
ABSTRACT
The implementation of Movement Control Order (MCO) due to the Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on an academic routine such as the teaching and learning (T&L) process. The best alternative to this situation is fully online T&L by using information and communication technology. There are four main components in online T&L; lecturer, student, pedagogy and learning object (LO), and technology. Students need to access provided LO virtually. This situation required student commitment to manage their own learning process or self-learning. Therefore, the aim of this research is to identify the pattern of LO accessing by students while in the MCO period and its relationship to subject achievement. This quantitative research used data and log from the e-learning portal for descriptive analysis to identify the pattern and its relationship to subject achievement. A result of the analysis shows that grade A students tend to access LO more than grade B and grade C students while text-based LO gets higher in accessing compared to the video. The next analysis shows that there is a relationship between the pattern of LO accessing and subject achievement. As an implication of study and discussion, lecturer and institution are highly recommended for specific T&L structure support by specific LO to help student achievement in the subject.
Downloads
References
Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students' Perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51. http://www.doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.%202020261309
Aguilar Gálvez, D., Noal, F. C., Arriola‐Guillén, L. E., Hugo, F. N., Leal, S. C., & Borba de Araujo, F. (2021). Virtual learning object for developing knowledge about the diagnosis and management of molar incisor hypomineralization. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/IPD.12925
Aguilar Gálvez, D., Noal, F. C., de Araujo, F. B., & Arriola-Guillén, L. E. (2021a). Virtual Learning Object: An asynchronous solution for virtual learning in dentistry post Covid-19. Journal of Dental Education. 85(S1), 1123–1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/JDD.12439
Aguilar-Gálvez D, Noal FC, de Araujo FB, Arriola-Guillén LE. Virtual learning object: an asynchronous solution for virtual learning in dentistry post COVID-19. J Dent Educ. 2021, 85(1), 1123- 1125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12439
Alharbi, A., Henskens, F., & Hannaford, M. (2014). Personalised learning object system based on self-regulated learning theories. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP). 4(3), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3348
Allen, C. A., & Mugisa, E. K. (2010). Improving learning object reuse through OOD: A theory of learning objects. J. Object Technol., 9(6), 51-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5381/jot.2010.9.6.a3
Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the covid-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education sciences, 10(9), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216
Al-Shareef, S. Y., & Al-Qarni, R. A. (2016). The effectiveness of using teacher-teacher wikis in collaborative lesson planning and its impact on teacher's classroom performance. English Language Teaching, 9(4), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n4p186
Ananga, P. (2020). Pedagogical Considerations of E-Learning in Education for Development in the Face of COVID-19. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 310-321. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.123
Anthony, J. (2014). The correlation between attendance and participation with respect to student achievement in an online learning environment. [Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University]. Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58825526.pdf
Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
Baki, A. dan Çakiroǧlu, Ü. (2010). Learning Objects in High School Mathematics Classrooms: Implementation And Evaluation. Computers & Education. 55(4): 1459–1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2010.06.009
Bakia, M., Shear, L., Toyama, Y., & Lasseter, A. (2012). Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity. Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2013/10/implications-online-learning.pdf. April, 15.
Balloun, J. L., Barrett, H., & Weinstein, A. (2011). One is not enough: The need for multiple respondents in survey research of organizations. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 10(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.22237/JMASM/1304223900
Berita Harian. (2022, Februari 9). Pelajar IPT dibenar masuk kampus mulai 1 Mac. Nasional. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2022/02/920756/pelajar-ipt-dibenar-masuk-kampus-mulai-1-mac
Bisol, C. A., Valentini, C. B., & Braun, K. C. R. (2015). Teacher education for inclusion: Can a virtual learning object help?. Computers & Education, 85, 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2015.02.017
Braga, J. C., Dotta, S., Pimentel, E., & Stransky, B. (2012, July). Desafios para o Desenvolvimento de Objetos de Aprendizagem Reutilizáveis e de Qualidade. In Anais do Workshop de Desafios da Computação Aplicada à Educação (pp. 90-99). http://br-ie.org/pub/index.php/desafie/article/view/2779/2432
Choez, J. S. M., Cedeño, L. A. D., Vélez, M. E. M., & Cedeño, M. P. D. (2021). Online Learning Objects in higher education, an alternative in times of pandemic. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(14), 3156-3165.
Cohen, E., & Nycz, M. (2006). Learning objects and e-learning: An informing science perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 2(1), 23-34.
Craig, A., Goold, A., Coldwell, J., & Mustard, J. (2008). Perceptions of roles and responsibilities in online learning: A case study. Interdisciplinary journal of e-learning and learning objects, 4(1), 205-223
Domínguez Romero, E., & Bobkina, J. (2021). Exploring the perceived benefits and drawbacks of using multimodal learning objects in pre-service English teacher inverted instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2961–2980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10386-y
Elfeky, A. I. M., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2016). The impact of learning object repository (lor) in the development of pattern making skills of home economics students. British Journal of Education, 4(2), 87-99.
Fertalj, K., Božić-Hoić, N., & Jerković, H. (2010). The integration of learning object repositories and learning management systems. Computer Science and Information Systems, 7(3), 387-407.
Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. A. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Cengage learning.
Guenaga, M., Mechaca, I., Romero, S., & Eguíluz, A. (2012). A tool to evaluate the level of inclusion of digital learning objects. Procedia Computer Science, 14, 148-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.017.
Guler, C., & Altun, A. (2010). Teacher Trainees as Learning Object Designers: Problems and Issues in Learning Object Development Process. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(4), 118-127.
Gunesekera, A. I., Bao, Y., & Kibelloh, M. (2019). The role of usability on e-learning user interactions and satisfaction: A literature review. Journal of Systems and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-02-2019-0024
Gürer, M. D., & Yıldırım, Z. (2014). Effectiveness of Learning Objects in Primary School Social Studies Education: Achievement, Perceived Learning, Engagement and Usability. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 39(176) https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3714
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.
IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata (2002). IEEE Std 1484.12.1-2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2002.94128
IESALC, UNESCO. 2020. COVID-19 and higher education: Today and tomorrow - Impact analysis, policy responses and recommendations. http://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/COVID-19-EN-090420-2.pdf. April 14, 2020
Kay, R. (2007). A systematic evaluation of learning objects for secondary school students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(4), 411-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/M770-J104-V701-8N45
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. (2020). Pengendalian program akademik di Universiti Awam (UA) dan Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi Swasta (IPTS). https://www.mohe.gov.my/hebahan/kenyataan-media/pengendalian-program-akademik-di-universiti-awam-ua-dan-institusi-pendidikan-tinggi-swasta-ipts.
Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: A Step-By-Step Guide For Beginners. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Liber, O. (2005). Learning objects: conditions for viability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(5), 366-373
Lima, E. F., & Siebra, C. A. (2021). Design of Learning Objects for Collaboration Promotion and their Effects on Students’ Behaviour. Informatics in Education, 20(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2021.05
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive Analysis in Education: A Guide for Researchers. NCEE 2017-4023. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/
Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world. IAU global survey report, 23. https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf. Mei 14, 2021
Menolli, A. L., Reinehr, S., & Malucelli, A. Social Learning: Defining Learning Objects from Social Tools. In Proceding of the International Conference WWW/Internet (ICWI), Madrid. pp 101 - 108
Moallem, M. (2015). The impact of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools on learner self-regulation, social presence, immediacy, intimacy and satisfaction in collaborative online learning. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(3), 55-77
Mohamad, A. M., Yusof, F. M., & Aris, B. (2014). Students view on Text Chats (CH), Forum Discussion (FR), and Online Learning Interaction (LI). Jurnal Teknologi, 69(1), 31–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.2872
Mothibi, G. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between e-learning and students’ academic achievement in higher education. Journal of Education and Practice. 6(9),6-10
Motta, L. D., Freitas, A. A. D., Janovik, R. X., Blatt, C. R., & Caregnato, R. C. A. (2021). COVID-19 evidence for all: development of a learning object in health teaching. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, 42. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200281
Nash, S. (2005). Learning objects, learning object repositories, and learning theory: Preliminary best practices for online courses. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 1(1), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.28945/422
Nguyen, V. A. (2017). The impact of online learning activities on student learning outcome in blended learning course. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 16(04). http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S021964921750040X
Nugent, G., Soh, L. K., Samal, A., Person, S., & Lang, J. (2005). Design, development, and validation of a learning object for CS1. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(3), 370-370. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151954.1067571
Onofrei, G., & Ferry, P. (2020). Reusable learning objects: a blended learning tool in teaching computer-aided design to engineering undergraduates. International Journal of Educational Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2019-0418
Parker, K., & Chao, J. (2007). Wiki as a teaching tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 57-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/386
Pejabat Perdana Menteri Malaysia. 2020. Perutusan Khas YAB Perdana Menteri Mengenai COVID-19 – 16 Mac 2020. https://www.pmo.gov.my/ms/2020/03/perutusan-khas-yab-perdana-menteri-mengenai-covid-19-16-mac-2020-2/ Mac, 1. 2020.
Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual university of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.1.212
Pratama, H., Azman, M. N. A., Kassymova, G. K., & Duisenbayeva, S. S. (2020). The Trend in using online meeting applications for learning during the period of pandemic COVID-19: A literature review. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(2), 58-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i2.15
Queiros, L. M., da Silveira, D. S., da Silva Correia-Neto, J. dan Vilar, G. (2016). LODPRO: Learning Objects Development Process. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 22(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13173-016-0043-6
Rafsanjani, A. H. N. (2018). A long term goal recommender approach for learning environments. [Doctoral Dissertation, Universidades do Minho]. Universidades do Minho, Aveiro, Porto. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/187230074.pdf
Reece, A. A. (2016). Best Practices in Digital Object Development for Education: Promoting Excellence and Innovation in Instructional Quality and Assessment. Journal of Learning Design, 9(1), 80-86
Sampson, D. G., & Zervas, P. (2013). Learning object repositories as knowledge management systems. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 5(2), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2013.05.009
Sek, Y. W., Law, C. Y., & Lau, S. H. (2012). The effectiveness of learning objects as alternative pedagogical tool in laboratory engineering education. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 2(2), 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJEEEE.2012.V2.98
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. United State of Americe: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Shamir-Inbal, T., Dayan, J., & Kali, Y. (2009). Assimilating online technologies into school culture. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5(1), 307-334
Stewart, M. F., & Zywno, M. (2005, June). Learning styles of engineering students, online learning objects and achievement. Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2—15253. http://dx.doi.org/10.18260/1-2--15253
Štuikys, V., Burbaite, R., dan Damaševičius, R. (2013). Teaching of computer science topics using meta-programming-based glos and lego robots. Informatics in Education, 12(1): 125–142. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2013.09
Wang, C., Davis, H. C., Dickens, K., Wills, G., & White, S. (2007). Finding the Right Tool for the Community: Bringing a Wiki-Type Editor to the World of Reusable Learning Objects. In Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007) (pp. 454-456). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2007.145
Wiley, D. A. (2002). The instructional use of learning objects (Vol. 1). Bloomington: Agency for instructional technology.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020
World Health Organization. (2020). Getting your workplace ready for COVID-19: how COVID-19 spreads, 19 March 2020 (No. WHO/2019-nCov/workplace/2020.2). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/getting-workplace-ready-for-covid-19.pdf
Xie, H., Liu, W., & Bhairma, J. (2018, December). Analysis of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning environments. In 2018 3rd Joint International Information Technology, Mechanical and Electronic Engineering Conference (JIMEC 2018) (pp. 270-274). Atlantis Press.
Yen, S. C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between: comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2141-2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9707-5
Zainuddin, A., & Kamaluddin, N. (2012). Exploring Malay Student's Commitment in Online Learning-A Case of Business Management Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.309
