Crime Prediction Using Geospatial Intelligence System for Crime Preventing

Authors

  • Hasranizam Hashim Centre of Studies for Surveying Science and Geomatics, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol14.1.6.2024

Keywords:

Crime mapping, GIS, Spatial statistic, Crime prediction

Abstract

Crime prediction relies on significant amounts of various data sources and is analysed through mathematical models, predictive analytics techniques, and machine learning algorithms to identify patterns of crime. To date, there has been little research conducted to examine and extend which repeat and near-repeat victimisation within crime hotspots can be collocated for crime prediction (Chainey et al., 2018). Therefore, this paper aims to identify crime patterns using crime prediction with repeat and near-repeat analysis. This study employed the GIS tool, namely, repeat and near-repeat analysis as the primary methods. Historical crime: all types of data used in the years 2015 and 2016 are analysed. The area of study is Petaling Jaya, Selangor. By using repeat and near-repeat analysis, the results reveal that there is a significant (p=0.01) and a meaningful near-repeat victimisation pattern were found in the study area. The most over-represented space-time range that is significant is the zone from 1 to 100 metres and from 0 to 7 days from the initial incident. The likelihood of another crime incident is approximately 22% higher than if there is no discernible pattern. The most over-represented repeat victimisation range that is significant is the zone from 0 to 7 days after an initial incident. The likelihood of another incident is approximately 78 percent higher than if there were no repeat victimisation patterns. This result also shows there are five local hotspots as prediction zones in the study area. The importance of the study is that it provides useful information for assisting law enforcement in improving crime prevention strategies using geospatial technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bowers, K. J., Johnson, S., & Pease, K. (2004). Prospective hot spotting: the future of crime mapping. British Journal of Criminology, 44(5), 641-658.

Brantingham, P.L., & Brantingham, P.J. (2008). Crime pattern theory. In Wortley, R., and Mazerolle, L. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis. UK: Willan Publishing.

Fielding, M., & Jones, V. (2012). Disrupting the optimal forager: Predictive risk mapping and domestic burglary reduction in Trafford, Greater Manchester. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 14(1), 30-41.

Forrester, D., Chatterton, M., Pease, K., & Brown, R. (1988). The Kirkholt burglary prevention project, Rochdale (Crime Prevention Unit Paper 13). London: Home Office.

Groff, E., & Taniguchi, T. (2019). Using citizen notification to interrupt near-repeat residential burglary patterns: the micro-level near-repeat experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15, 10.

Haberman, C., & Ratcliffe, J. (2012). The predictive policing challenges of near-repeat armed street robberies. Policing. A Journal of Policy and Practice, 6, 151-166.

Johnson, S, D., Summers, L., & Pease, K. (2009). Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 181- 200.

Morgan, F. (2000). Repeat burglary in a Perth suburb: indicator of short-term or long-term risk? Crime Prevention Studies, 12, 83-118.

Pease, K. (1998). Repeat victimisation: taking stock. Crime detection and prevention series paper 90. London: Home Office Police Research Group.

Ratcliffe, J., & Rengert, G. (2008). Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Security Journal, 21, 58-76.

Sagovsky, A., & Johnson, S. D. (2007). When does repeat burglary victimisation occur? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 1-26.

Wang, Z., & Lui, X. (2017). Analysis of burglary hot spots and near-repeat victimization in a large chinese city. ISPRS International Journal of Geo Information, 6, 148.

Weisel, D. (2005) Analyzing repeat victimization, problem solving tools series No. 4. Problem-oriented guides for police. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice.

Weisburd, D., & Lum, C. (2006). The diffusion of computerized crime mapping in policing: linking research and practice. Police Practice and Research, 6(5), 420-432.

Wells, W., Wu, L., & Ye, X. (2012). Patterns of near-repeat gun assaults in Houston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 186-212.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Hashim, H. (2024). Crime Prediction Using Geospatial Intelligence System for Crime Preventing. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 14(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol14.1.6.2024