Utilising ‘Toh’ Models in Reducing Misconceptions in Orbital Hybridisation among Matriculation College Students

Authors

  • Amal Harun Department of Science Chemistry, Negeri Sembilan Matriculation College Kuala Pilah, 72000 Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Rosmawati Jamluddin Department of Science Chemistry, Negeri Sembilan Matriculation College Kuala Pilah, 72000 Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Nik Abibahton Nik Ali Department of Science Chemistry, Negeri Sembilan Matriculation College Kuala Pilah, 72000 Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Norleha Md Dukol Department of Science Chemistry, Negeri Sembilan Matriculation CollegeKuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol14.1.3.2024

Keywords:

Hybridisation, Hybrid orbitals, Matriculation, Chemistry

Abstract

The concept of hybridisation is one of the most difficult concepts for chemistry students to grasp at all levels of learning. Research showed the students conceptual difficulty ranged from their lack of the pre-requisite knowledge for grasping the topic hybridisation to chemical bond formation and orientations of atomic orbitals. This study investigated the difficulties and misconceptions held by matriculation students about atomic orbitals and hybridization. A total of 88 students were used in the study in Negeri Sembilan Matriculation College. The participants responded to multiple choice and constructed response questions on hybridization at the start of the research. They answered the different set of questions but same difficulties level at the end of a two weeks treatment period. The responses were analyzed and response categories established on their misconceptions. The post-test was to assess their gain in conception at the end of the treatment period after using TOH Model. The findings showed that matriculation students' knowledge of atomic orbitals and hybridization was seriously distorted. Suggestions have been made for more effective teaching approaches to ensure better understanding of the concept and encourage active learning among students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atchia, S. M. C. (2022). Development and Testing of the DTSICM Model: A design thinking strategy to identify and clear misconceptions in science. KnowEx Social Sciences, 2(01), 30-44.

Boothe, J. R., Zotos, E. K., & Shultz, G. V. (2023). Analysis of post-secondary instructors’ pedagogical content knowledge of organic acid–base chemistry using content representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.

Hunter, K. H., Rodriguez, J. M. G., & Becker, N. M. (2022). A review of research on the teaching and learning of chemical bonding. Journal of chemical education, 99(7), 2451-2464.

Islamiyah, K. K., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2022). The effectiveness of remediation learning strategy in reducing misconceptions on chemistry: A systematic review. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 7(1), 63-77.

Marifa, H. A., Abukari, M. A., Samari, J. A., Dorsah, P., & Abudu, F. (2023). Students’ perceptions of the pedagogical content knowledge of chemistry teachers on the concept of hybridization. Science, 11(2), 61-76.

Morgante, P. P., & Autschbach, J. (2023). Molecular Orbitals. American Chemical Society.

Okebukola, P. A., Shabani, J., Ntwari, I., Nineza, C., & Ndikuryayo, F. (2023). Reasons explaining the difficulties of understanding the concepts in the study of general chemistry in burundi universities. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 17(1), 1-14.

Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2023). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: A case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50-70.

Ping, R., Church, R. B., Decatur, M. A., Larson, S. W., Zinchenko, E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2021). Unpacking the gestures of chemistry learners: What the hands tell us about correct and incorrect conceptions of stereochemistry. Discourse processes, 58(3), 213-232.

Reshmi, D. B. (2023). Problems faced by diploma engineering students in learning chemical reaction. Kaladarpan कलादर्पण, 97-108.

Silberberg, M. (2017). Chemistry: the molecular nature of matter and change with advanced topics. McGraw-Hill Education.

Sombria, K. J. F., Celestial, D. L., Jalagat, C. G. M., & Valdez, A. G. (2023). Online learning through google classroom: Effects on students critical thinking skills in chemistry. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 3(2), 193-210.

Vladusic, R., Bucat, R. B., & Ozic, M. (2023). Understanding covalent bonding–a scan across the Croatian education system. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.

Yang, X., Jugovac, M., Zamborlini, G., Feyer, V., Koller, G., Puschnig, P., Soubatch, S., Ramsey, M.G., & Tautz, F.S. (2022). Momentum-selective orbital hybridisation. Nature Communications, 13(1), 5148.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Amal Harun, Jamluddin, R., Nik Ali, N. A., & Md Dukol, N. (2024). Utilising ‘Toh’ Models in Reducing Misconceptions in Orbital Hybridisation among Matriculation College Students. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 14(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol14.1.3.2024