An assessment of place attachment in Melaka from tourists’ perspectives and ICT

Penilaian Terhadap Place Attachment di Melaka daripada Perspektif Pelancong dan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi (ICT)

Authors

  • Ab. Rahman Syakir Amir Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Dura Nur’hidayah Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Aizat Nik Mohd Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Azhari Afzal Badan Warisan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Masuda Yukihiro Department of Planning, Architecture and Environmental Systems, Shibaura Institute of Technology Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/geografi.vol8.2.3.2020

Keywords:

sense of place, place attachment, trip frequency, information and communication technology (ICT)

Abstract

The rapid urban population growth worldwide has given rise to complex cities across the globe, particularly concerned with place attachment and digital technologies. In this new landscape, the emergence of smart devices is highly favorable to connect everyday infrastructures via the present networks available to create a sense of place. The concept of sense of place in heritage and culture is synonymous with Melaka as a famous heritage site which achieved recognition from UNESCO. However, when it comes to tourist behaviors, their place attachment, arrivals and purpose of visit highly influence their perceptions. Their priority in selecting Melaka as their holiday destination might differ based on several place attachment affective factors which are influenced by digital technologies. There are several problems to consider in order to improve place attachment in the study area, which are the prosperity of the tourism industry in Melaka threatening its own authenticity and the rapid modernization of the area dehumanizing its sense of place. Based on these factors, there is seemingly a conflict between the digital world and place attachment among the tourists in the study area. Therefore, the study aims to ascertain the concept of place attachment and determine the relationship between travel behavior (focusing only on trip frequency) and place attachment affective factors in response to digital technologies. By using ANOVA, the level of place attachment can be analyzed using data involving background of respondents, trip frequency and place attachment affective factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altman. I., & Low. S. (1992). Place attachment. Plenum Press.

Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54 (15), 2787–2805.

Babbie, E. R. (2010). The practice of social research. 12th ed. Wadsworth Cengage.

Buhalis, D. & Amaranggana, A. (2014). Smart tourism destination. In Z. Xiang, & L. Tussyadiah (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 553-564). Springer.

Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. Architectural Press.

Chin, C. (2016). Are we losing the ‘real’ Malacca? Star2.com (newspapers). The Star Online.

Cross, J. E. (2001). What is sense of place, research on place and space.

Erb, Y. (2011). Some aspects about the Internet of things, the advantages and challenges: Business aspects of the Internet of things. ETH Zurich.

Gustafson, P. (2001). Meaning of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 5-16.

Gutiérrez, V., Galache, J. A., Sánchez, L., Muňoz, L., Hernández-Muňoz, J. M., Fernandes, J., et al. (2013). Smart Santander: Internet of things research and innovation through citizen participation. In A. Galis, & A. Gavras (Eds.), The future Internet (pp. 173-186). Springer.

Hashemnezhed, H., Heidari, A. A., & Hoseini, P. M. (2012). "Sense of place” and “place attachment”: A comparative study. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 3 (1), 5-10.

Hoseini, P. M., Hashemnezhad, H., & Heidari, A. A. (2013). Sense of place and place attachment. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 3 (1), 5–12.

Kai, B., & Chen, C. B. (2011). Edutourism: The study of tourism behaviour of international students in Malaysia. January.

Korkmaz, H., Atay, L., & Yalçınkaya, P. (2018). An evaluation on smart tourism. China-USA Business Review, 17 (6), 308-315.

Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.

Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research, Cambridge: Polity; Mesch, G., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception and local attachment. Environment and Behaviour, 30, 504-519.

Liu, S. (2005). A Theoretic Discussion of Tourism E-commerce. In 7th International Conference on Electronic Commerce. ACM Press, New York, 1-5.

Low, S. M. (1992). Symbolic ties that bind: Place attachment in the plaza. In I. Altman, & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 165-168), Plenum Press.

Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior, 30, 504-519.

McKeever, S., Ye, J., Coyle, L., Bleakley, C., & Dobson, S. (2010). Activity recognition using temporal evidence theory. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 2 (3), 253-269.

Majlis Bandaraya Melaka Bersejarah (2019). Technical Report of Melaka Tengah District Local Plan 2035 (Amendment). Department of town and Country Planning MBMB.

Mingjun, W., Zhen, Y., Wei, Z., & Xishang, D. (2012). A research on experimental system for Internet of Things major and application project. 3rd International Conference on System Science, Engineering Design and Manufacturing Informatization (ICSEM).

Muijis, D. (2010). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. 2nd edition. SAGE Publications.

Najafi, M., & Shariff, M. K. B. M. (2011). The concept of place and sense of place in architectural studies. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 80 (8), 1100–1106.

Nolan, R. L. (1979). Managing the Crisis in Data Processing. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 115-126.

Paul M. M. (2012). Psychology Applied to Work: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Tenth Edition Paul, 53 (9), 1689–1699.

Rapoport, A. (1990). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. The University of Arizona Press.

Roughneen, S. (2018). Melaka’s tourism drives prosperity but threatens its charm. Nikkei Asian Review.

Seamon, D., & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and placelessness (1976): Edward Relph. Key Texts in Human Geography, January 2008, 43–52.

Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: an empirical measurement. Geofmm, 22, 347-358.

Sime, J. D. (1986). Creating places or designing spaces? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6 (1), 49-63.

Solomon, M. R. (1996). Consumer behavior (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Steele, F. (1981). The sense of place. CBI Publishing Company, Inc.

Werthner, H., & Ricci, F. (2004). E-commerce and tourism. Communications of the ACM, 47 (12), 101–105.

Van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard, 16 (4), 33–36.

Zhang, D., Zhou, J., Guo, M., Cao, J., & Li, T. (2011). TASA: Tag-free activity sensing using RFID tag arrays. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 22 (4), 558–570.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-17

How to Cite

Syakir Amir, A. R., Nur’hidayah, D., Nik Mohd, A., Afzal, A., & Yukihiro, M. (2020). An assessment of place attachment in Melaka from tourists’ perspectives and ICT: Penilaian Terhadap Place Attachment di Melaka daripada Perspektif Pelancong dan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi (ICT). GEOGRAFI, 8(2), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.37134/geografi.vol8.2.3.2020

Issue

Section

Articles