Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) DNA Model Formation
Pembentukan Kerangka Model DNA Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)
Keywords:Organizational DNA, DNA structure, human capital, heritage, institutions of higher learning
Public institutions of higher learning such as the Universiti Teknologi MARA is an organization that is well-acquinted in terms of academic glory as well as the personality of its employees. An organization can survive with its glory which rests on the origins of the previous administrators who led to its status as it is today. Looking at this situation, three objectives have been listed which are to identify UiTM employees who have put their trusts in UiTM. Secondly, the data is analysed qualitatively and analyze and thirdly, to form a UiTM DNA model that can be used as a reference for the top management in the formation of human capital and the implementation of strategic planning. There are three sources of data obtained for the data analysis process. First, the primary data obtained through an interview session with the former Vice Chancellors of UiTM. Second, an exploratory survey with 187 respondents consisting of six different categories of respondent and the third source comes from secondary data of speeches and books from the former Vice Chancellor of UiTM. The methods used in analyzing the data were content analysis method, exploratory data analysis and word frequency using word generator. Using a DNA metaphor resulted ftrom biological epistemology, this DNA structure has a backbone that binds nitrogenous bases in the DNA. Therefore, the UiTM DNA model formed is based on three main components, the backbone of "Nation, Knowledge and Success" and then binds to the nitrogen basis of "Thoughts, Emotions, Spirit, Aspirations and Behavior" which also forms a model known as PESAT (an acronym based on the 5 main components of the UiTM DNA model). This study provides a new contribution to the organization in administering and managing its citizens based on the sustainability of identity and precise aspirations, especially those involving large organizations.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Dicle, M.F. & Dicle, B. (2018). Content Analysis: Frequency Distribution of Words. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata. Volume: 18, issues 2, pg: 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1801800205.
Firdaus W.M.K. (2015). Analisis data kualitatif. https://www.slideshare.net/wmkfirdaus/analisis-data-kualitatif-47191738.
Hadi, K. (2021). Membangun budaya kepatuhan sebagai DNA organisasi: Untuk industri jasa kewangan. https://hrdspot.com/event/budaya-kepatuhan-sebagai-dna-organisasi/
Harrow, J., Nagy, A., Reymond, A., Alioto, T., Patthy, L., Antonarakis. S. E., & Guigó, R. (2019). Identifying protein-coding genes in genomic sequences. Genome Biology, 10(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-1-201
Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. S. (2012). The UX Book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Morgan Kaufmann.
Holtzblatt, K., Wendell, J. B., & Wood, S. (2004). Rapid contextual design: a how-to guide to key techniques for user-centered design. Elsevier.
Istichlal, F. (2012). DNA Organisasi sebagai Budaya Korporat. https://masfahmi.wordpress.com/2012/05/05/dna-organisasi-corporate-culture/
Lamm, E. (2012). Inheritance Systems. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Spring 2012 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/inheritance-systems/
Lozano, O., Gomez, H., & Rositas, I. (2012). Organizational DNA. http://sintec.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/OrganizationalDNA_Sintec1.pdf
Lucero, A. (2015). Using affinity diagrams to evaluate interactive prototypes. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 231-248). 15th Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT). https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01599865
Megat Ayop Megat Arifin & Abd. Halim Ahmad. (2016). Kepentingan budaya integriti dan etika kerja dalam organisasi di Malaysia: Suatu tinjauan umum. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(9), 138 - 149.
Mohd Khairul Adib Abdul Rahman. (13 September, 2020). Cabaran membina DNA penjawat awam. Sinar Harian Online. https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/100867/BERITA/Wawancara/Cabaran-membina-DNA-penjawat-awam
Mujib, H. (2017). Organizational identity: An ambiguous concept in practical terms. Administrative Sciences, 7(3), 1-30.
National Human Genome Research Institute. (2014). Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA). https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Deoxyribonucleic-Acid
Nugroho, R. A. (2019). 5 Fungsi DNA dalam tubuh manusia, berperanan sebagai duplikasi diri. https://www.liputan6.com/citizen6/read/3925154/5-fungsi-dna-dalam-tubuh-manusia-berperan-sebagai-duplikasi-diri
PriceWaterHouse Cooper (2014). PWC 10minutes Organizational DNA. Does your organization’s DNA enable or impede your strategy? https://www.scribd.com/document/236250404/Pwc-10minutes-Organizational-Dna
Saenger, W. (1984). Principles of nucleic acid structure. Springer-Verlag.
Vihinen, M. (2018). Systematics for types and effects of DNA variations. BMC Genomics, 19(974), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5262-0.