Generation Z’s Purchasing Intention of Cruelty-free Cosmetic Products: The Moderating Role of Environmental and Animal Welfare Concerns

Authors

  • Ralph Allen M. Bonifacio College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, 1008 Manila, Philippines
  • Alyssa Faye G. Baui College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, 1008 Manila, Philippines
  • Maria Yza Thalia C. Uy College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, 1008 Manila, Philippines
  • Agnes Jocelyn Bandojo College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, 1008 Manila, Philippines
  • Antonio E. Etrata Jr. College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, 1008 Manila, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol17.1.10.2024

Keywords:

Environmental and Animal Welfare Concerns, Cruelty-Free, Cosmetic Products, Purchasing Intention, Generation Z

Abstract

Numerous brands worldwide offer cruelty-free products due to consumers' increasing support against the unethical practice of animal testing and the demand for sustainability in the cosmetics industry. However, there was a considerable gap between the use of environmental and animal welfare concerns as the moderating variable to attitudes, social influence, and awareness of consumers to issues and their effect on the purchasing intention of cruelty-free cosmetic products. This paper determined if environmental and animal welfare concerns moderated the factors affecting Generation Z's purchasing intention of cruelty-free cosmetic products. The study used a descriptive-correlational research design and purposive sampling method. Google Form survey questionnaires were distributed and answered by 220 respondents aged 18 to 26 living in the National Capital Region. Furthermore, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to examine the hypotheses. The findings emphasized that environmental and animal welfare concerns moderated the effect of attitude, consumer awareness, and social influence on the purchasing intention of cruelty-free cosmetic products.  The study concluded that Generation Z prioritized brands committed to ethical production and environmental impact over other factors affecting the purchasing intention of cruelty-free cosmetics, advocating a reconsideration of animal testing practices. This environmental consciousness allowed brands to align with shifting consumer preferences, with practical implications for enhancing market appeal and brand loyalty. Moreover, lawmakers could leverage study insights to refine regulations, promoting ethical practices in the Philippine cosmetic industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalia, F. R., & Darmawan, A. (2023, December). Exploring consumer purchase intention towards cruelty-free personal care products in Indonesia. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 11, 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100136

Amora, J., Ochoco, M., & Anicete, R. (2016). Student engagement and college experience as the mediators of the relationship between institutional support and academic performance. Digital Journal of Lasallian Research, 12, 15–30.

Amberg, N., & Fogarassy, C. (2019). Green consumer behavior in the cosmetics market. Resources, 8(3), 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/resources8030137

Cachero-Martínez, S. (2020). Consumer Behaviour towards Organic Products: The Moderating Role of Environmental Concern. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 13, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13120330

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Çoker, E. N., & Van Der Linden, S. (2020). Fleshing out the theory of planned behavior: Meat consumption as an environmentally significant behavior. Current Psychology, 41(2), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00593-3

De Canio, F., Martinelli, E. and Endrighi, E. (2021). Enhancing consumers' pro-environmental purchase intentions: the moderating role of environmental concern, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(9), 1312-1329. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2020-0301

Fornell C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. http://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Gillani, A., & Kutaula, S. (2018). An introduction to special issue: Sustainability and ethical consumerism. Management Decision, 56(3), 511-514. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2018-949

Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., & Da Silva Nogueira, S. P. (2023). Willingness to pay more for green products: A critical challenge for Gen Z. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, 136092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136092

Gómez-Carmona, D., Marín-Dueñas, P. P., Tenorio, R. C., Domínguez, C. S., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2022). Environmental concern as a moderator of information processing: A fMRI study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 369, 133306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133306%20Get%20rights%20and%20content

Grappe, C.G., Lombart, C., Louis, D., & Durif, F. (2021). “Not Tested on Animals”: How consumers react to cruelty-free cosmetics proposed by manufacturers and retailers?. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(11), 1532–1553. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2020-0489

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1987). Multivariate data analysis. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139 – 151.

Humane Society International. (2019). Public demands animal testing bans. Humane Society International. https://www.hsi.org/news-media/public-demands-animal-testing-bans/

In-Cosmetics. (2022). Gen Z: What do they look for in personal care | in-cosmetics Connect. In-cosmetics Connect | the In-cosmetics Group Is the Meeting Point and Learning Hub for the Personal Care Development Community Worldwide. https://connect.in-cosmetics.com/regions/in-cosmetics-asia/gen-z-what-do-they-look-for-in-personal-care/

Kock, N. (2017). WarpPLS user manual: Version 6.0. ScriptWarp Systems: Laredo, TX, USA, 141.

Magano, J., Au-Yong-Oliveira M., Ferreira B., & Leite, Â. (2022). A Cross-sectional study on ethical buyer behavior towards cruelty-free cosmetics: What consequences for female leadership practices? Sustainability, 14(13), 7786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137786

Malik, C., & Singhal, N. (2017). Consumer environmental attitude and willingness to purchase environmentally friendly products: An SEM Approach. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 21(2), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262917700991

Morel, S., Sapino, S., Peira, E., Chirio, D., & Gallarate, M. (2023). Regulatory Requirements for Exporting Cosmetic Products to Extra-EU Countries. Cosmetics, 10(2), 62. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9284/10/2/62

Nabilla, F. (2019, August 26). Advertising attitude, green purchase intention and environmental concern: Promoting functional versus emotional appeals. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 5(4), 199-223. https://doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.5.10003-4

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Ogiemwonyi, O., & Harun, A. B. (2020). Consumption of green product as a means of expressing green behaviour in an emerging economy: With the case study of Malaysia. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 11(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425320938538

Petruzzi, D. (2023). Cosmetics Industry - Statistics & Facts. Statista. Retrieved March 20, 2023, from https://www.statista.com/topics/3137/cosmetics-industry/#topicOverview

Rocca, R., Acerbi, F., Fumagalli, L., & Taisch, M. (2022). Sustainability paradigm in the cosmetics industry: State of the art. Cleaner Waste Systems, 3, 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100057

Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems, 193-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0179-6.ch010

Sadiq, M., Adil, M., & Paul, J. (2021). An innovation resistance theory perspective on purchase of eco-friendly cosmetics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102369

Schwartz, S. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5

Sreedhar, D., Manjula N., Pise, A., Pise, S., & Ligade, V. (2020). Ban of cosmetic testing on animals: A brief overview. International Journal of Current Research and Review, 12(14), 113-116. https://doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2020.121424

Sreen, N., Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Tan, T. M., & Alharbi, F. (2021, July). Behavioral reasoning perspectives to brand love toward natural products: Moderating role of environmental concern and household Size. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102549

Uddin, S., & Khan, M. Z. A. (2018). Young consumer’s green purchasing behavior: Opportunities for green marketing. Journal of Global Marketing, 31(4), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2017.1407982

Vania, C. & Ruslim, T. S. (2023). The effect of environmental concern, attitude, green brand knowledge, green perceived value on green purchase behavior with green purchase intention as a mediating variable on green beauty products. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis, 9 (3), 325 - 340.

Wilson, N., & Edelyn, E. (2022). Predicting Indonesian consumers’ intention to buy green cosmetics using the modified TPB framework. Journal of Business and Applied Management, 15(2), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.30813/jbam.v15i2.3137

Wuisan, E. C., & Februadi, A. (2022). Consumers' attitude towards the cruelty-free label on cosmetic and skincare products and its influence on purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Innovation (JMI), 2(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.35313/jmi.v2i2.35

Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. (2017). Determinants of consumers' green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecological Economics, 134, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019

Yadav, S. (2020). Cruelty in cruelty-free cosmetics: Is an Indian consumer contributing towards cruel, unethical cosmetic companies?, International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 8(11), 1111-1128. http://doi.one/10.1729/Journal.24988

Downloads

Published

2024-02-09

How to Cite

Bonifacio, R. A., Baui, A. F., Uy, M. Y. T., Bandojo, A. J., & Etrata, A. (2024). Generation Z’s Purchasing Intention of Cruelty-free Cosmetic Products: The Moderating Role of Environmental and Animal Welfare Concerns. International Business Education Journal, 17(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol17.1.10.2024